Solved

Cisco > ASA5500 > Setting up a NAT address to a port.

Posted on 2006-11-28
8
271 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-10
I have having trouble setting up a NAT translation rule for a port that I want to redirect to a server.  I currently have one that does work, and I have basically copied that rule, changing the port number but still no luck.

I would like some help to setup a rule that will forward request to <IP address>:448/blah/ or http://servername.domain.com:448/blah/ to go to 192.168.223.253 on port 448.
0
Comment
Question by:iceman19330
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 4
8 Comments
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:knightrider2k2
ID: 18030923
Example

static (inside,outside) tcp 4.3.2.1 448 192.168.223.253 448 netmask 255.255.255.255

Access-list outside_in extended permit any host 4.3.2.1 eq 448
0
 

Author Comment

by:iceman19330
ID: 18030948
Are those command line entries?
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:knightrider2k2
ID: 18030967
yes.
0
Don't Cry: How Liquid Web is Ensuring Security

WannaCry is just the start. Read how Liquid Web is protecting itself and its customers against new threats.

 

Author Comment

by:iceman19330
ID: 18031007
Access-list outside_in extended permit any host 4.3.2.1 eq 448

Result of the command: "Access-list outside_in extended permit any host 4.3.2.1 eq 448"

Access-list outside_in extended permit any host 4.3.2.1 448
                                                        ^
ERROR: % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:knightrider2k2
ID: 18031050
sorry

access-list outside_in extended permit tcp any host 4.3.2.1 eq 448
0
 
LVL 7

Accepted Solution

by:
knightrider2k2 earned 500 total points
ID: 18031068
also

access-group outside_in in interface outside
0
 

Author Comment

by:iceman19330
ID: 18031179
I dont seem to be getting anything forwarded to port 25 any longer?
Could something have been disabled?
0
 

Author Comment

by:iceman19330
ID: 18031279
Okay that was freaky, but it looks okay now.
0

Featured Post

Is your NGFW recommended by NSS Labs?

Ours is! NSS Labs Next Generation Firewall Test gives the WatchGuard Firebox M4600 a "Recommended" rating! Curious where your NGFW landed on the  Security Value Map? See the map and download the full report today!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

#Citrix #Citrix Netscaler #HTTP Compression #Load Balance
Meet the world's only “Transparent Cloud™” from Superb Internet Corporation. Now, you can experience firsthand a cloud platform that consistently outperforms Amazon Web Services (AWS), IBM’s Softlayer, and Microsoft’s Azure when it comes to CPU and …
In this tutorial you'll learn about bandwidth monitoring with flows and packet sniffing with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're interested in additional methods for monitoring bandwidt…
Michael from AdRem Software outlines event notifications and Automatic Corrective Actions in network monitoring. Automatic Corrective Actions are scripts, which can automatically run upon discovery of a certain undesirable condition in your network.…

691 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question