Celebrate National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

Execution Plan: How to reduce a Sort / Distinct Sort ?

Posted on 2006-11-28
7
Medium Priority
?
3,520 Views
Last Modified: 2008-02-01
Hi I have the following query:

select distinct a,b,c,d
from table
where condition1

UNION

select distinct a,b,c,d
from table
where condition2

The result returns me 6 lines from about 4000 lines of the table which is correct.
The problems is that the query is very slow, more than 4mn with a P4 Bi-processor 3Ghz !

After a look in the execution plan I notice that a Sort / distinct Sort takes me 94% of cost !

Is there a way to improve the query and to reduce the time of execution ?

Thanks & regards.


0
Comment
Question by:bruno_boccara
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 3
7 Comments
 
LVL 35

Accepted Solution

by:
Raynard7 earned 1000 total points
ID: 18032488
One very quick thing that you could do is remove the distinct from your above queries - the union will remove duplicates anyway
0
 
LVL 29

Assisted Solution

by:Nightman
Nightman earned 1000 total points
ID: 18032494
UNION will already apply distinct

What about this:

select a,b,c,d
from table
where condition1

UNION

select a,b,c,d
from table
where condition2

Also, consider placing a non-clustered compound covering index on columns a,b,c,d
0
 

Author Comment

by:bruno_boccara
ID: 18032534
I removed the distinct but it didn't change anything.
I still have the Sort / Distinct Sort with 94% cost.
0
Ransomware: The New Cyber Threat & How to Stop It

This infographic explains ransomware, type of malware that blocks access to your files or your systems and holds them hostage until a ransom is paid. It also examines the different types of ransomware and explains what you can do to thwart this sinister online threat.  

 

Author Comment

by:bruno_boccara
ID: 18032550
I also have indexes on columns used in condition1 and condition2
0
 
LVL 35

Expert Comment

by:Raynard7
ID: 18032665
is this from the same table or different tables? if it is from the same table can you combine the conditions into one statement?

how fast to the individual queries run? this may be the problem.
0
 

Author Comment

by:bruno_boccara
ID: 18032984
It's Ok I found the error.
there was an unwanted table in the from.

I will split the points between us to thanks you for your tries.
0
 
LVL 35

Expert Comment

by:Raynard7
ID: 18032998
glad its now working
0

Featured Post

New feature and membership benefit!

New feature! Upgrade and increase expert visibility of your issues with Priority Questions.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Ever wondered why sometimes your SQL Server is slow or unresponsive with connections spiking up but by the time you go in, all is well? The following article will show you how to install and configure a SQL job that will send you email alerts includ…
This article shows gives you an overview on SQL Server 2016 row level security. You will also get to know the usages of row-level-security and how it works
Via a live example, show how to setup several different housekeeping processes for a SQL Server.
Viewers will learn how to use the SELECT statement in SQL to return specific rows and columns, with various degrees of sorting and limits in place.

730 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question