Solved

500pts: Which methods to implement in a class by default i.e ToString()?

Posted on 2006-11-29
7
180 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-16
Hi there,

I was looking for some b ackground info on what methods i should be implementing by default in my classes (or overriding)...

I remember seeing a document once outlining best practises ... what to override, what interfaces to use if you wish to use a foreach on your class etc... but i just can't find it...

I was wondering if anyone has any recommendations of what methods / properties I should be implementing /overriding by defautl?

Also currently i am always using and awful lot 'private' access modifiers on classes... should i really be using protected so it can be picked up in another class/derived class... i suppose this depends,, but it was just concerning me that all my classes contain private members etc

Look forward to any information..

Thanks in advance

Ian
0
Comment
Question by:ianinspain
7 Comments
 
LVL 48

Expert Comment

by:AlexFM
ID: 18035294
By default, ToString returns type name. If you want to replace this with something helpful, override ToString.
All other depends on your requirements. If class should be serializable, implement ISerializable interface. If class is some collection wrapper, implement INumerable interface. If class allocates some unmanaged resources, or has IDisposable members, implement IDisposable interface.

If you don't want this class to be inherited, make it sealed, and make all non-public method private.
If you want to allow inheritance, don't use sealed. Decide, which methods you want to be inherited, and make them protected.
0
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:existenz2
ID: 18041048
Basicly you don't need to override any class by default. If you aren't using the ToString() method, don't bother overriding it.

For the rest it's basicly what AlexFM says. However I would add that you should implement IDisposable also when the object can contain a lot of data. That way it gets cleaned a bit quicker when you call the Dispose() method.
0
 
LVL 29

Assisted Solution

by:anarki_jimbel
anarki_jimbel earned 150 total points
ID: 18041479
about private, protected etc. modifiers.

There are good reasons to use them all, again, it depends on your needs and requirements. It's a common practice to have private fields and access them through public properties. If you need to extend some classes you still may have private fieldsin them and access them through public properties. In some other situations protected comes quite handy...
0
Announcing the Most Valuable Experts of 2016

MVEs are more concerned with the satisfaction of those they help than with the considerable points they can earn. They are the types of people you feel privileged to call colleagues. Join us in honoring this amazing group of Experts.

 
LVL 48

Accepted Solution

by:
AlexFM earned 200 total points
ID: 18043326
>> you should implement IDisposable also when the object can contain a lot of data.
There are two reasons to implement IDisposable: class allocates unmanaged resources, or contains disposable members. Lot of data is not a reason. Dispose method doesn't release managed resources, even if there is a lot of them.
0
 
LVL 14

Assisted Solution

by:existenz2
existenz2 earned 150 total points
ID: 18043469
Alex> I agree, wasn't really clear about that. However if you have a very big byte array in your class, you most likely do want to do "data = null;" in the overriden Dispose() method. The data won't be freed right away, but it will get the "clean" flag faster and the Garbage Collector will free it up faster then normally. That's what I meant to say.
0
 
LVL 48

Expert Comment

by:AlexFM
ID: 18043569
Let's say that array belongs to class instance. If class instance has 0 reference counter, it becomes candidate for garbage collecting. At the same time, this array becomes candidate for garbage collecting as well, if it is not referenced somewhere outside of class. Array has reference counter 1, but it is referenced only from "dead" instance, so this array is still subject of collecting. Setting array reference to null inside of class reduces array reference counter to 0, but this doesn't change anything.
It is interesting to write simple program which tests this, I will do this some time later. However, this discussion is out of scope of original question.
0
 

Author Comment

by:ianinspain
ID: 18075781
excellent thanks... splitting points..

Ian
0

Featured Post

Announcing the Most Valuable Experts of 2016

MVEs are more concerned with the satisfaction of those they help than with the considerable points they can earn. They are the types of people you feel privileged to call colleagues. Join us in honoring this amazing group of Experts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Extention Methods in C# 3.0 by Ivo Stoykov C# 3.0 offers extension methods. They allow extending existing classes without changing the class's source code or relying on inheritance. These are static methods invoked as instance method. This…
Introduction This article series is supposed to shed some light on the use of IDisposable and objects that inherit from it. In essence, a more apt title for this article would be: using (IDisposable) {}. I’m just not sure how many people would ge…
Two types of users will appreciate AOMEI Backupper Pro: 1 - Those with PCIe drives (and haven't found cloning software that works on them). 2 - Those who want a fast clone of their boot drive (no re-boots needed) and it can clone your drive wh…
Although Jacob Bernoulli (1654-1705) has been credited as the creator of "Binomial Distribution Table", Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716) did his dissertation on the subject in 1666; Leibniz you may recall is the co-inventor of "Calculus" and beat Isaac…

856 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question