Solved

Quick script - to create folders

Posted on 2006-11-30
5
1,303 Views
Last Modified: 2008-01-09
OK Guys

I need to replicate a users problem

to do so I need a script that will generate some folders

top level

1
  |
  |
   ------2
             |
             |
             ---------3

etc etc - all the way to 200 folders deep all nested inside each other

NB Why I'm doing this: A client has a folder like this that he cant delete - Ive told him to use RD /S and Killbox and Gipo Move on boot on the folder - no joy.
   I want to replicate the problem here but I don't want to manually create the folder structure
0
Comment
Question by:Pete Long
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:Steve Knight
ID: 18044044
@echo off
c:
mkdir c:\startdir 2>NUL
cd \startdir
for /l %%a in (1,1,200) do mkdir %%a & cd %%a

Try this... goes down to 81 deep for me then fails.
0
 
LVL 43

Accepted Solution

by:
Steve Knight earned 500 total points
ID: 18044065
Suggest a way to get rid of it would be to share part way down the tree then map a drive to it and delete from there?

Shortening it to this:

@echo off
c:
mkdir c:\startdir 2>NUL
cd \startdir
for /l %%a in (1,1,200) do mkdir 1 & cd 1

Creates a directory structure all called 1\1\1\1\1 which allows more to be created... but still not 200
Steve
0
 
LVL 57

Author Comment

by:Pete Long
ID: 18044955
ah 84 folders will do - for now

Basically I wanted to see if

rd /s /q "startdir"

would delete them all and it did (up to 84 folders anyway) the client says his is 200 folders deep - so Im not sure why his WONT work - unless the path is too long for the command interpreter?
0
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:Steve Knight
ID: 18045338
I think its the path limit, 255 chars I imagine.  As I suggested try creating a share further down or map a drive to part way down the tree and see if that works but yes the 81/84 seems to work fine!

Good luck

Steve
0
 
LVL 57

Author Comment

by:Pete Long
ID: 18047140
No Probs - Cheers Steve :)
0

Featured Post

Enroll in June's Course of the Month

June’s Course of the Month is now available! Experts Exchange’s Premium Members, Team Accounts, and Qualified Experts have access to a complimentary course each month as part of their membership—an extra way to sharpen your skills and increase training.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The following is a collection of cases for strange behaviour when using advanced techniques in DOS batch files. You should have some basic experience in batch "programming", as I'm assuming some knowledge and not further explain the basics. For some…
Using dates in 'DOS' batch files has always been tricky as it has no built in ways of extracting date information.  There are many tricks using string manipulation to pull out parts of the %date% variable or output of the date /t command but these r…
Come and listen to Percona CEO Peter Zaitsev discuss what’s new in Percona open source software, including Percona Server for MySQL (https://www.percona.com/software/mysql-database/percona-server) and MongoDB (https://www.percona.com/software/mongo-…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…

717 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question