remote/serializable interface

no

ok. good point

>>>called from another JVM
>>>transfered to another JVM

so are they not closely related? or are they related at all ? do they follow the same concept? or are they opposites?

something tells me they are related somehow. or may be i am wrong :)


thanks
J

How do you define the relation between two interfaces? Usualy, by extending a common interface. There is no such case here. The only similarity I can see is that they are both used when running remote code - though neither is absolutely necessary and can be used independent of one each other.