We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

Compare UltraSPARC performance to Intel Dual Core

atoncelli
atoncelli asked
on
3,228 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-29
Hello,
 I have 2 Solaris servers that I would like to upgrade.  I am thinking to move to Linux and buy Dell servers with the new Intel Dual Core processor.
This is my issue.  I don't know how to compare the speed and performance of these 2 servers vs. new Intel servers.
Is there any data that can help me make my decision easier?  
The first server is qute old, the second one is newer and quite fast.  
It would be nice to have at least an idea of what from the Intel/AMD world is comparable to these machines.  In this way I can plan my purchuse based on getting the same performances or buying something better depending on the budget available.

In details...
My first server is:

System Configuration:  Sun Microsystems  sun4u Sun Enterprise 450 (4 X UltraSPARC-II 400MHz)
System clock frequency: 100 MHz
Memory size: 2048 Megabytes
========================= CPUs =========================

                    Run   Ecache   CPU    CPU
Brd  CPU   Module   MHz     MB    Impl.   Mask
---  ---  -------  -----  ------  ------  ----
SYS     0     0      400     4.0   US-II    9.0
SYS     1     1      400     4.0   US-II    9.0
SYS     2     2      400     4.0   US-II    9.0
SYS     3     3      400     4.0   US-II    9.0


2nd server:

System Configuration: Sun Microsystems  sun4u Sun Fire V440
System clock frequency: 177 MHZ
Memory size: 16GB      

==================================== CPUs ====================================
               E$          CPU                  CPU     Temperature
CPU  Freq      Size        Implementation       Mask    Die   Amb.  Status      Location
---  --------  ----------  -------------------  -----   ----  ----  ------      --------
  0  1593 MHz  1MB         SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIIi   3.3     -     -    online       -      
  1  1593 MHz  1MB         SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIIi   3.3     -     -    online       -      
  2  1593 MHz  1MB         SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIIi   3.3     -     -    online       -      
  3  1593 MHz  1MB         SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIIi   3.3     -     -    online       -      

Thanks

Comment
Watch Question

andyalderretired saggar maker
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Distinguished Expert 2019

Commented:
Sun have a name for reliability, Dell doesn't. Wouldn't it be more useful to ask for a comparison of a Sun Sparc based box and a Sun Intel based box? Or even a Sun Sparc box Vs an IBM or HP box.

Author

Commented:
I just would like to contemplate the idea to move from a Solaris to a Linux machine.  Dell was just annexample of a platform with INTEL/AMD technology.
What ever can be found to compare a SPARC to an x86 computer would be fine for me.
Thanks
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2014

Commented:
Well first thing is what are you using them for?  Web servers that serve up static pages have different performance needs from Web servers that are doing dynamic HTML, which have different needs from database servers.

Sun sells AMD based servers.

Author

Commented:
The servers are used for source control.  They run Telelogic software (Informix database).

Author

Commented:
Just to clarify, the information I am looking for is benchmarks that can compare Solaris system (with UltraSPARC) to intel systems (Dell, HP ot others).
Thanks
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2014

Commented:
You may want to look at some of of the TPC benchmarks.  They do not directly compare Intel to Sparc, but if you look at some of the test you can find different configurations for each.

     http://www.tpc.org/tpch/results/tpch_results.asp?orderby=hardware

This is a list of the TPC-H by hardware vendor by database size.  Of couse the first thing that you should do (hopefully you have) is to make sure the software you are running will run under Linux on x86.

Generally newer Intel will perform better than older Sparc, but newer Sparc will also perform better than older Sparc.  I could not find any new comparsisions, all were from the late 90's comparing Intel's running between 450-1000 Mhz to Sparc running at 100-200 Mhz and the Sparcs performed about 2-4.

As Intel/AMD are now int the 3GHz range for some functions they may equal today's fastest Sparcs.

Author

Commented:
I reviewed some that data but it's not very friendly.
Is there a free tool that can be run on the systems to get some CPU/Memory/HD benchmark to have some basic data I can use to compare the computers?
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2014
Commented:
This one is on us!
(Get your first solution completely free - no credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION

Author

Commented:
I am not looking to upgrade necessarely.  Same performance would be fine.  I have to change computer though because the new version of Telelogic doesn't support Solaris 9 which is what I have at the moment.  Therefore, while I am purchusing a new machine ( I have to leave the other one on line during the upgrade) I was thinking to also investigate the possibility to move to Linux.  Some Telelogic users found they were able to get better performance and save money.
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2014

Commented:
Upgrading to Solaris 10 is not an option I guess?

I would strongly suggest that you be very carefull about how a change of an enviroment "saves" money.  My background is in IBM mainframe enviroments.  What I call small, but most would call "large" (1500-2000 mainframe MIPS).  I call is small because we are a service originazation for envirments that have 5000-10000 mainframe MIPS.  It is amazing how many shops "saved money" by migrating off the mainframe.  They save money in hardware and in SOME instances software.  However their support costs go through the roof.  They don't even count their enviromental costs.  The largest mainframe today fully loaded only draws about 18 Kw.  The same is about 5 fully loaded blade servers from most vendors.  The problem is to replace the largest fully loaded mainframe take about 50 fully loaded blade servers.

So you need to watch what you mean by save money.  Sure Linux can be less expensive that Solaris.  However, what happens when you find a bug in Linux?  Solaris, you call up Sun and they fix it.  Linux, you can try and fix it yourself or report it to the Open Source commuity, that then needs to fix if, but it may take them longer than Sun takes.  It might not. but you never know.
Unlock the solution to this question.
Join our community and discover your potential

Experts Exchange is the only place where you can interact directly with leading experts in the technology field. Become a member today and access the collective knowledge of thousands of technology experts.

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.