SharePoint 2007 List Item Save Conflicts
On SharePoint Server 2007, after users edit a list item, when they try to edit the item immediately after the initial edit, they get the following error message:
Save Conflict
Your changes conflict with those made concurrently by another user. If you want your changes to be applied, click Back in your Web browser, refresh the page, and resubmit your changes.
Troubleshoot issues with Windows SharePoint Services.
Due to the critical nature of the list items, users need to make edits.
Thanks in advance for any help. We will open the doors on our intranet portal and this is one of the last few issues that we have.
glbt
Save Conflict
Your changes conflict with those made concurrently by another user. If you want your changes to be applied, click Back in your Web browser, refresh the page, and resubmit your changes.
Troubleshoot issues with Windows SharePoint Services.
Due to the critical nature of the list items, users need to make edits.
Thanks in advance for any help. We will open the doors on our intranet portal and this is one of the last few issues that we have.
glbt
Last Comment
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
THIS SOLUTION IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
Windows Server 2003
Windows Server 2003 was based on Windows XP and was released in four editions: Web, Standard, Enterprise and Datacenter. It also had derivative versions for clusters, storage and Microsoft’s Small Business Server. Important upgrades included integrating Internet Information Services (IIS), improvements to Active Directory (AD) and Group Policy (GP), and the migration to Automated System Recovery (ASR).
129K
Questions
--
Followers
--
Top Experts
Get a personalized solution from industry experts
TRUSTED BY
ASKER
In most cases, it takes about 5 minutes to be able to edit the list item after an initial edit. According to one user, there was an instance where it took nearly an hour. I can not substantiate that claim.
My current topology is one SharePoint 2007 web front end that also runs some shared services and a back end SQL 2005 server which has SAN attached storage.