Solved

Network Setup

Posted on 2007-03-20
5
189 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-18
Our company recently moved to new offices.  The building was already cables but there were not enough network points on the wall near the clusters of desks so I installed a small switch for each desk.  I had initall bought some cheap ones just to get the initial setup.  These switches are not preforming very well, loosing conection and having to be reset frequently.  My plan is to move the network to gigabit speeds to i what to gigabit switches.  There are 4 computers to a desk cluster and there are 5 desk clusters.  I already have my 3 servers linked to a gigabit. switch.  I found a 3 com switch (3Com 8 port 10/100/1000 Gigabit Switch).  http://www.3com.com/products/en_US/detail.jsp?tab=features&pathtype=purchase&sku=3C1670800A.

Does anyone have any comments about this setup.  I want to make sure I buy the correct equipment.  
0
Comment
Question by:Kevin Robinson
  • 2
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:p_davis
ID: 18755386
you probably already thought of this but to take advantage of the gigabit network you will also need gigabit nics
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:Kevin Robinson
ID: 18755623
Yes Most my new PCs have Gigabit cards.  I just have a few more to upgrade.

Is there any problem. conecting so many small switches together.
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:vpt-inc
ID: 18759332
The only problem with connecting many fewer port switches together is that you are going to be limiting your throughput to the 1 uplink port.  So essentially your 4 computers or however many you connect to each switch will be sharing the bandwidth of the 1 up.  Just a side note, if you are connecting from switch to switch you will need a crossover cable.
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:vpt-inc
ID: 18759343
Obviously the sharing limitation will be multiplied if you are cascading from switch to switch to switch to gateway or somthing like that.
0
 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
p_davis earned 500 total points
ID: 18763183
i personally would install some more network drops. the more nodes you have the more management is going to be involved and the more troubleshooting you are going to have to do if something fouls up. but if you are willing to accept that and what vpt-inc had said then there is no problem doing this, it probably just isn't the best practice but necessity sometimes dictates what we do.
0

Featured Post

Top 6 Sources for Identifying Threat Actor TTPs

Understanding your enemy is essential. These six sources will help you identify the most popular threat actor tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs).

Join & Write a Comment

Suggested Solutions

When posting a question about a Cisco ASA, Cisco Router or Cisco Switch, it can aid diagnosis if a suitably sanitised copy of the config is provided. It is much better to leave as much of the configuration as original as possible, as it could be tha…
Before I go to far, let's explain HA (High Availability) and why you should consider it.  High availability is the mechanism used to provide redundancy to any service at the same site and appears as a single service to the users of that service.  As…
In this seventh video of the Xpdf series, we discuss and demonstrate the PDFfonts utility, which lists all the fonts used in a PDF file. It does this via a command line interface, making it suitable for use in programs, scripts, batch files — any pl…
This video gives you a great overview about bandwidth monitoring with SNMP and WMI with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're looking for how to monitor bandwidth using netflow or packet s…

760 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

17 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now