• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1116
  • Last Modified:

finding the array size (sizeof)

I currently have an if statement which compares two values.

One of these values represents the size of an array.  I've created this value by having the following code in the loop which generates the array (size++)

Is there another way to do this, is there a function called sizeof which could be used in a function like this:

if value01 < sizeof(array01);
{
    //some code
}

Many Thanks
0
andyw27
Asked:
andyw27
  • 3
  • 2
1 Solution
 
itsmeandnobodyelseCommented:
>>>> Is there another way to do this

the sizeof function only works on fixed arrays but not on pointers or arrays passed to a function:

    int array[3];
    int size = sizeof(array) / sizeof(int);    // ok size == 3

    int arr* = new int[3];
    int size = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(int);  // not ok: size == 1   == pointer size

    void f(int arr[])
    {
          int size = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(int);  // not ok: size == 1   == pointer size
    }

So, for dynamic arrays it is good practice to store the size in an extra variable so that it can be passed or evaluated where needed.
    void f(int arr[], int siz)
    {
          int size = iz; // ok
    }

Regards, Alex

0
 
itsmeandnobodyelseCommented:
Correction:

  int* arr = new int[3];
0
 
andyw27Author Commented:

Cheers,

I've tried, however I'm getting the following problem:

error C2070: illegal sizeof operand
0
Free Tool: Port Scanner

Check which ports are open to the outside world. Helps make sure that your firewall rules are working as intended.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

 
andyw27Author Commented:

Please ignore that last remark.
0
 
navaneeth_f50Commented:
i think in the above comment made the size is mistaken by the length of array...so i prefer the program as
 
if value01 < size;
{

    int size = sizeof(array01) ;
    //some code
}
as the array grows it will be automatically updated.....in the above coment,
>>>>>  int size = sizeof(array) / sizeof(int);    // ok size == 3
it gives the length of the array......
size=how much space it will take to store the data......
length=how many variables it has(whatever may be the size of each variable)
0
 
itsmeandnobodyelseCommented:
>>>> the size is mistaken by the length of array
though I understand what navaneeth wants to say his opinion is not commonly agreed. E. g. the STL which is part of C++ standard uses member function size() for number of elements and only the string class has length as a synonym, additionally. IMO, the space an array or a container will take is a minor value and though I personally prefered items() or elements() in my former container classes, we can't oversee that size() has lost the meaning of space in bytes in most standard C++ programs.

Regards, Alex
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Cloud Class® Course: Microsoft Office 2010

This course will introduce you to the interfaces and features of Microsoft Office 2010 Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Access. You will learn about the features that are shared between all products in the Office suite, as well as the new features that are product specific.

  • 3
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now