Solved

Exchange 2003 Enterprise adding addtional mail store

Posted on 2007-03-21
6
252 Views
Last Modified: 2010-05-18
Hello Experts,

We are using Exchange 2003 Enterprise on a member server. Currently we have a single mail store.  The Priv1 and Pub1 are approximately 28 gigs combined at the present time. We recently configured RPC/HTTP (Thank You Simon) and are in the process of rolling it out to outside branches. I know that this is going to cause our mail store to grow. We have approximate 125 users in our outer branches and presently they are using up very little space. At what point would it be prudent to create a second store on the same server, move users mailboxes, and the best approach of doing so. We have around 230 gigs free on the server so space is not a concern (yet).  Is it better to leave it in one larger store or split it up for maintenance reasons, if one store was corrupt it would only take down a portion of the company during a repair. Or would the Exchange Server be a little more finicky with multiple stores.

Any comments would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

Wendell
0
Comment
Question by:wdfng
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 10

Accepted Solution

by:
ryangorman earned 250 total points
ID: 18767811
Multiple smaller stores give better control than a single monolithic store. Maintenance is better because you'll only disrupt a potion of your users when/if you need take a store offline. You can place different policies on each mailbox store, and so can manage mailbox limits per store.

You should take advantage of storage groups and place your new mailbox stores into their own storage group[1]. Be aware that Exchange 2003 Enterprise limits you to four storage groups. Ideally, each mailbox store and storage group's transaction logs should be on their own mirrored disks.

Members of distribution groups that are either large in size or receive large emails should be placed into the same mailbox store. This makes mail delivery more efficient.[1] This is the model that Exchange 2007 encourages.

0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:ryangorman
ID: 18767817
The last paragraph should read

Members of distribution groups that are either large in size or receive large emails should be placed into the same mailbox store. This makes mail delivery more efficient.

[1] This is the model that Exchange 2007 encourages.
0
 
LVL 104

Expert Comment

by:Sembee
ID: 18768319
I tend to split things up, although your user number doesn't really justify using the number of storage groups and mailbox stores.

Therefore I would suggest splitting it now, before things get too large. Find a way to group the users in to four (location, job role etc) and then move them about.

Simon.
0
Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 

Author Comment

by:wdfng
ID: 18774924
Simon,

Are you suggesting that I spilt it into four stores? We have a little over two hundred users currently, and were going to split them by location/dept. Being that we do not currently have multiple spindles to separate the stores on as Ryan suggested (Thank You Ryan), Is it common practice to create the new stores and transaction logs in a separate directory and not the default MDBDATA that the current store is in?


Thank you,
Wendell
0
 
LVL 104

Assisted Solution

by:Sembee
Sembee earned 250 total points
ID: 18775615
If the server has been built to best practises then you will not have either the logs or the databases in mdbdata as they will be on their drives/partitions.

Transaction logs are grouped by Storage Groups, so if you have four mailbox stores in the storage group then they will all be using the same set of transaction logs.
However the mailbox stores are in their own files. I tend to put these into their own folders, purely to make identification easier.
I usually create a folder called Exchange Databases and then sub folders of that.

The key thing is to have the stores and logs on separate drives - otherwise the server will just be thrashing itself.

Simon.
0
 

Author Comment

by:wdfng
ID: 18796316
Thnak You both!!
0

Featured Post

Announcing the Most Valuable Experts of 2016

MVEs are more concerned with the satisfaction of those they help than with the considerable points they can earn. They are the types of people you feel privileged to call colleagues. Join us in honoring this amazing group of Experts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Marketers need statistics and metrics like everybody else needs oxygen. In this article we explain how to enable marketing campaign statistics for Microsoft Exchange mail.
This process describes the steps required to Import and Export data from and to .pst files using Exchange 2010. We can use these steps to export data from a user to a .pst file, import data back to the same or a different user, or even import data t…
In this Micro Video tutorial you will learn the basics about Database Availability Groups and How to configure one using a live Exchange Server Environment. The video tutorial explains the basics of the Exchange server Database Availability grou…
A short tutorial showing how to set up an email signature in Outlook on the Web (previously known as OWA). For free email signatures designs, visit https://www.mail-signatures.com/articles/signature-templates/?sts=6651 If you want to manage em…

730 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question