Email Hosting

Posted on 2007-03-22
Last Modified: 2010-03-06
My company’s management is exploring the possible of having our email hosted by a third party instead of being done in house. We are currently on Exchange 5.5 and holding on migrating to Exchange 2007 because of this. Here's my question. My company has about 85 users some of which have access to other people calendars and mailboxes. Can this still be done if email is hosted outside our company? What are the pros and con's of not having an Exchange server in house?
Question by:compdigit44
  • 2
LVL 10

Expert Comment

ID: 18771974
Yes, if you go with an Exchange hosted solution you will be able to most of those thigns you already do.  You can set permissions so users can access other users calendars, mailboxes, etc.  You can do delegates and more.  I personally like to have my mail in house just for control purposes.  However, I have seen some who have had great success with 3rd party hosted Exchange.  Really depends if you want to be able to resolve issues in house, make changes etc, or call a 3rd party.  No granted most simple things you can manage through the web interface that they provide, like adding users, groups etc.
LVL 20

Author Comment

ID: 18772116
What can't you do with an Exchange hosted email solution?
LVL 10

Assisted Solution

MATTHEW_L earned 130 total points
ID: 18772263
The full level of administration that you get in the building.  Not sure if you can choose what virus / spam filtering you want or they provide whatever they use.  The flexibility to make changes to your OWA pages etc, install additonal software etc.

If it's not available in their web interface, you would have to call them.  Whereas your own server hosted internally, a quick RDP session into it and you can change whatever you like.

I mean the benefits though also are that you are not responsible for mainteance or fixing problems etc, which takes some load off of your plate.
LVL 104

Accepted Solution

Sembee earned 145 total points
ID: 18775264
There is talk (mainly from the hosting industry) that everyone under 100 users should be looking at hosted Exchange rather than using their own kit.
How this works with regards to unified messaging is still to be answered and makes the hosters go quiet.

If you are considering going to E2007 then you will lose a number of features - unified messaging is the major feature loss.
You will also lose some of the features in OWA like remote folder access to your own file servers and/or Sharepoint servers.

Something I am seeing happening more often now though is hosting your own kit in a data centre. Particularly if you have a high number of remote users you can see some performance gains.



Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Scam emails are a huge burden for many businesses. Spotting one is not always easy. Follow our tips to identify if an email you receive is a scam.
In-place Upgrading Dirsync to Azure AD Connect
The basic steps you have just learned will be implemented in this video. The basic steps are shown to configure an Exchange DAG in a live working Exchange Server Environment and manage the same (Exchange Server 2010 Software is used in a Windows Ser…
This video shows how to quickly and easily add an email signature for all users on Exchange 2016. The resulting signature is applied on a server level by Exchange Online. The email signature template has been downloaded from: www.mail-signatures…

735 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question