Unable to catch STL acess violation exceptions in VS2005

Hi Guys,

I am using Visual Studio 2005 and have "Yes With SEH Exceptions (/EHa)" for project properties: C++-->Code Generation-->Enable C++ Exceptions.

But I am not able to catch the following Microsoft STL vector access violation exception error. I am able to catch normal null object pointer access violation exceptions.

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
      try
      {
            string sTmpString ;
            vector<string> vTmpTokens;
            vTmpTokens.push_back("T");
            sTmpString = vTmpTokens[1].c_str();

      }
      catch (...)
      {
            cout<<"Caught an access violation";
            return 1;
      }
}

Thank you,
Kiran
pallikiAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

jkrCommented:
You cannot catch access violations as STL exceptions, since they are SEH exceptions unles you provide a translator, e.g. like in http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5z4bw5h5(VS.80).aspx


#include <windows.h>
#include <eh.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;

void trans_func( unsigned int u, EXCEPTION_POINTERS* pExp )
{
    cout <<  "In trans_func." << endl;
    throw std::exception;
}

int main()
{
      try
      {
            _set_se_translator( trans_func );

            string sTmpString ;
            vector<string> vTmpTokens;
            vTmpTokens.push_back("T");
            sTmpString = vTmpTokens[1].c_str();

      }
      catch (...)
      {
            cout<<"Caught an access violation";
            return 1;
      }
}
0
DarrylshCommented:
use at() instead of [ ]

so instead of:

sTmpString = vTmpTokens[1].c_str();

you should use

sTmpString = vTmpTokens.at(1).c_str();
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
pallikiAuthor Commented:
Hi Darrylsh,

Can you please explain the reason?
The operator [] and the function at() both return a reference to the vector element at a specified position. what's the difference?

Thanks a lot,
Kiran
0
DarrylshCommented:
The difference is that at() does bounds checking and throws an exception when you give it an invalid index. As a trade-off for speed, [] does not do any bounds checking and does not throw a c++ exception.  Instead, you get an access violation just as you would with a c-array.  

This trade-off is done by design.   I would speculate based that it was a compromise to encourage C users to adopt the c++ containers which they would probably not be inclined to do if it was significantly slower.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
C++

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.