Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

how i can forward some port to IP address (in pix 525)

Posted on 2007-03-23
4
Medium Priority
?
366 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-16
hi
how i can forward some port to IP address
i wnat to forword port 80,110,25 to ip 172.16.110.2 (and i want to use static nat)
is the below command true

X.X.X.X = public ip
static (inside,outside) X.X.X.X 172.16.110.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
access-list OutsideIn permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq www                                                            
access-list OutsideIn permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq smtp                                                            
access-list OutsideIn permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq pop3      

thanks                                                




0
Comment
Question by:nasemabdullaa
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 28

Assisted Solution

by:batry_boy
batry_boy earned 500 total points
ID: 18780579
Do this:

static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x www 172.16.110.2 www netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x smtp 172.16.110.2 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x pop3 172.16.110.2 pop3 netmask 255.255.255.255

Your access list statements look fine.  Remember to apply the access list to the interface:

access-group OutsideIn in interface outside

Hope this helps...
0
 

Author Comment

by:nasemabdullaa
ID: 18780672
hi
thanks for your reply
you mean the command must be like this

static (inside,outside) X.X.X.X 172.16.110.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x www 172.16.110.2 www netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x smtp 172.16.110.2 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x pop3 172.16.110.2 pop3 netmask 255.255.255.255
access-list OutsideIn permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq www                                                            
access-list OutsideIn permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq smtp                                                            
access-list OutsideIn permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq pop3      
access-group OutsideIn in interface outside

is that true or not

thanks
0
 
LVL 28

Accepted Solution

by:
batry_boy earned 500 total points
ID: 18780739
Well, not exactly.

The first static in your above post:

static (inside,outside) X.X.X.X 172.16.110.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

would cause ALL ports to be forwarded from x.x.x.x to 172.16.110.2.  You stated in your initial question that you wanted to forward 3 ports (smtp, pop3, and www) to 172.16.110.2.  I thought you meant you wanted to use port redirection such that only those 3 ports would be forwarded to the internal host.  If what you meant is that you want to only ALLOW those 3 ports inbound, but translate ALL ports, then your first static is all you would need and you can get rid of the last 3 statics.  Does that make sense?

In other words, the following commands are pointless if the first static is also in there:

static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x www 172.16.110.2 www netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x smtp 172.16.110.2 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x pop3 172.16.110.2 pop3 netmask 255.255.255.255

So, to do what you want you only need this one static:

static (inside,outside) X.X.X.X 172.16.110.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

or these 3 statics, but not both sets of commands:

static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x www 172.16.110.2 www netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x smtp 172.16.110.2 smtp netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x pop3 172.16.110.2 pop3 netmask 255.255.255.255

Having said this, you will still need the access list statements as they are.  Please let me know if I need to clarify.
0
 

Author Comment

by:nasemabdullaa
ID: 18780773
thanks
0

Featured Post

Introducing the WatchGuard 420 Access Point

WatchGuard's newest access point includes an 802.11ac Wave 2 chipset, providing the fastest speeds for VoIP, video and music streaming, and large data file transfers. Additionally, enjoy the benefits of strong security as the 3rd radio delivers dedicated WIPS protection!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

A 2007 NCSA Cyber Security survey revealed that a mere 4% of the population has a full understanding of firewalls. As business owner, you should be part of that 4% that has a full understanding.
On Feb. 28, Amazon’s Simple Storage Service (S3) went down after an employee issued the wrong command during a debugging exercise. Among those affected were big names like Netflix, Spotify and Expedia.
As a trusted technology advisor to your customers you are likely getting the daily question of, ‘should I put this in the cloud?’ As customer demands for cloud services increases, companies will see a shift from traditional buying patterns to new…
Both in life and business – not all partnerships are created equal. Spend 30 short minutes with us to learn:   • Key questions to ask when considering a partnership to accelerate your business into the cloud • Pitfalls and mistakes other partners…
Suggested Courses

704 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question