Solved

exchange server is running out of space

Posted on 2007-03-26
4
195 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-06
Our exchange server is running out of space. Should I put 2 message stores to each logical drive, or should each store have its own disk array for optimum performance? What’s the performance loss, assuming that the two stores have fewer users than the previous larger store? Is it better to use RAID 5 or RAID 1 for your message stores?
0
Comment
Question by:ScottSullivanPFS
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 104

Expert Comment

by:Sembee
ID: 18793242
Which is better?
That is very objective.

I have done both, and haven't seen a significant change in either. The major performance gain comes when you split the transaction logs and the database on to separate drives.

It also depends on how many users and what size are the mailboxes.
What I would do for 10 users with 20mb mailboxes and what I would do for 2000 users with 400mb mailboxes are very different.

In an ideal, money no object world, you would have a separate array for each storage group and each set of transaction logs. Not many of us work in an ideal world.

Unfortunately you haven't really provided enough information to answer comprehensively, and it would probably be difficult for you to do so. I configure servers in a different way for most clients, based on their individual needs.

Simon.
0
 

Author Comment

by:ScottSullivanPFS
ID: 18793665
I have 800GB of email and 1200 mailboxes. I have 16 disks to work with. Transaction logs are already on separate RAID 1e (similar to 10) disks—I think 6 of the 16 disks are used by transaction logs. I do have transaction logs from 2 of the storage groups writing to the same logical disk—would that cause serious performance issues?

0
 
LVL 104

Accepted Solution

by:
Sembee earned 500 total points
ID: 18794002
Shouldn't cause any problems.
What sort of transaction logs do you create between backups? The only thing I might have considered doing instead of six disks in a single set was three lots of two. That may squeeze a little more out - but you aren't going to gain much.

Have you run perfmon on the box to see if you are getting any disk performance issues?

Simon.
0
 

Author Comment

by:ScottSullivanPFS
ID: 18901588
I am getting performance issues on a storage group with 600 users. I’ll try and spread them out.
0

Featured Post

Are your AD admin tools letting you down?

Managing Active Directory can get complicated.  Often, the native tools for managing AD are just not up to the task.  The largest Active Directory installations in the world have relied on one tool to manage their day-to-day administration tasks: Hyena. Start your trial today.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Exchange server is not supported in any cloud-hosted platform (other than Azure with Azure Premium Storage).
Scam emails are a huge burden for many businesses. Spotting one is not always easy. Follow our tips to identify if an email you receive is a scam.
In this Micro Video tutorial you will learn the basics about Database Availability Groups and How to configure one using a live Exchange Server Environment. The video tutorial explains the basics of the Exchange server Database Availability grou…
To add imagery to an HTML email signature, you have two options available to you. You can either add a logo/image by embedding it directly into the signature or hosting it externally and linking to it. The vast majority of email clients display l…

776 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question