Solved

Subnet question for private B class 172.16.x.x  ip range

Posted on 2007-03-29
4
15,199 Views
Last Modified: 2010-09-05
I support a network that is setup a lot like this example: ( http://www.experts-exchange.com/Networking/Misc/Q_21105296.html?sfQueryTermInfo=1+172.16+255.240.0.0+privat )
172.16.1.x for routers
172.16.2.x for switches
172.16.3.x for servers
172.16.4.x for network printers
172.16.5.x for management devices
172.16.6.x for DHCP
172.16.7.x for wireless access points
etc., etc.
with a subnet of 255.255.0.0

After reading RFC 1918 ( http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1918.html ) that states that a private B class IP should have a network address of 172.16.x.x with a subnet of 255.240.0.0. I can switch my subnet right now from 255.255.0.0 to 255.240.0.0 without much difficulty. After reading the post on Experts Exchange I am a little confused on what is the best practice. Should I have the /12 subnet or is the /16 subnet for the private range known as an acceptable practice?
0
Comment
Question by:Natldiag
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:learn2earn
ID: 18817351
If I am reading your info correctly
you want to know if you should be using a subnet mask of 255.240.0.0 ( answer is no )
You should use subnet mask 255.255.0.0 because you are using a Class B.

Class A: 255.0.0.0
Class B: 255.255.0.0
Class C: 255.255.255.0
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a00800a67f5.shtml
I hope this helps!

0
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:learn2earn
ID: 18817377
To seperate your networks you would use a subnet mask of ( 255.255.255.0 ).
With this mask it will break out your networks.
172.16.1.x for routers
172.16.2.x for switches
172.16.3.x for servers
172.16.4.x for network printers
172.16.5.x for management devices
172.16.6.x for DHCP
172.16.7.x for wireless access points
0
 

Author Comment

by:Natldiag
ID: 18817955
learn2earn thanks for your feedback. Currently we do not have it subnetted, so we just have one subnet with the /16 subnet. Looking at RFC 1918 ( http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1918.html ) , it looks like 172.16.x.x - 172.31.x.x is reserved for a private range? Could you please explain section 3 RFC 1918 to me if it is incorrect that you would use the 255.240.0.0 subnet for a private 172.16.x.x range? I know that normally the  last two octets are subnetted in a class B range, which is why I became curious about this.
0
 
LVL 79

Accepted Solution

by:
lrmoore earned 250 total points
ID: 18818116
>Could you please explain section 3 RFC 1918 to me if it is incorrect that you would use the 255.240.0.0 subnet for a private 172.16.x.x range?

You are referring to this section of the RFC, and I can understand your confusion..

The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the
   following three blocks of the IP address space for private internets:
     10.0.0.0        -   10.255.255.255  (10/8 prefix)
     172.16.0.0      -   172.31.255.255  (172.16/12 prefix)
     192.168.0.0     -   192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix)

That simply states that particular block of Class B addresses are reserved for designation as "private internets". The /12 is simply a CIDR notation that defines the summary group.
That does not relinquish the fact that all 172.x.x.x IPs are by definition Class B, and Class B subnet mask is defined 255.255.0.0  /16

There is simply zero value in you changing out your existing /16 mask infrastructure.
Remember, you are free to use any mask between /12 and /30 and any combination thereof using variable length subnet masks (VLSM) in any manner you choose.
0

Featured Post

Connect further...control easier

With the ATEN CE624, you can now enjoy a high-quality visual experience powered by HDBaseT technology and the convenience of a single Cat6 cable to transmit uncompressed video with zero latency and multi-streaming for dual-view applications where remote access is required.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
ip igmp join-group 8 81
snmp v2 configuration on a switch 3 61
ASA NAT rule change 3 77
Advice on router and switch 25 79
Tired of waiting for your show or movie to load?  Are buffering issues a constant problem with your internet connection?  Check this article out to see if these simple adjustments are the solution for you.
I recently attended Cisco Live! in Las Vegas, a conference that boasted over 28,000 techies in attendance, and a week of hands-on learning hosted by a solid partner with which Concerto goes to market.  Every year, Cisco displays cutting-edge technol…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…
In this tutorial you'll learn about bandwidth monitoring with flows and packet sniffing with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're interested in additional methods for monitoring bandwidt…

734 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question