Solved

New server hardware/performance

Posted on 2007-03-29
9
323 Views
Last Modified: 2008-01-09
Hi experts.

In the next few months Ill be starting up an IT related business, and require some guidance as the following issues:

 * What server to purchase
    * Need to know: Specifications (Processing power, RAM), price
    * Must be: Rack mountable.
 * Will the server be reliable/able to handle the load?

   
At this point we are thinking of one sole sever that will act as a web server, database server, flash media server. Multiple servers would be nice, but our pockets are not endless.

The server will be running the following software:

 * Windows 2003 Small Business Sever
 * Microsoft ISA (firewall)
 * IIS web server running an asp.net site
 * Flash Media Sever 2
 * Microsoft SQL Server 2000.

Majority of web requests will utilise use an asp.net page to retrieve information in database, and stream media back to the client. How many of these simultaneous requests will our server be able to handle? 200 - 1000 simultaneous requests are what we currently need.

Please feel free to give any comments on my setup. If there are any limitations/tips/tricks which will affect my servers reliability/performance please comment.


Potential issues:
For 2 years Ive been working with a server of the above software specifications (Except Flash Media Server 2), and Ive found that SQL Server really chews up memory, and Ive heard rumours ASP.NET sites may do the same. Sometimes we have difficulty connecting via VPN/remote desktop, though a reboot of IIS/MS SQL fixes this. Is this common? Is there any way to prevent such issues?

Maximum uptime and reliability are of highest priority. The server will be housed remotely, I require VPN/Remote desktop to be solidly reliable.

Looking forward to all comments.

Andy
0
Comment
Question by:undyshelts
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
9 Comments
 
LVL 63

Accepted Solution

by:
SysExpert earned 64 total points
ID: 18821367
I would put SQL all by itself, since it is a resource hog.

All the other stuff should be OK on a sngle server.

Also, depending on web load, you might need to think about things like failover to a secondary server or clustering.

I would look at the DL380 G5 from compaq or one of the bigger models that can handle 4 CPUs

Dell will have similar servers also.

RAID 5 with a hot spare in the machine is a requirement as is dual power supplies hooked up to differnt UPS's

Try to eliminate any single point of failure !

I hope this helps !
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:undyshelts
ID: 18821982
Put SQL server by itself, I saw that one coming! From what Ive read MySQL isnt a memory hog, would it be recommended to install this on the same server as the other services?

From what I can see the DL380GS G5 takes up 2 rack slots, we may have to pay for two rack slots costing us double. What do you think of the Dell PowerEdge 1950? Alternatively, any recommended single rack servers?

How many simultaneous web requests  do you estimate a DL380GS G5 to handle?

I see what you mean about the single point of failure. Early days well just have 1 server, then in the future purchase another server and cluster IIS, and maybe FMS 2.
0
 
LVL 3

Assisted Solution

by:Gatelodge
Gatelodge earned 62 total points
ID: 18822297
I am involved (at my present contract) with installing lots of the 1950's and 2950's. Both are good servers. As with most servers the more memory and CPU's you can cram in the better. You may already know this, but you would be better with the 2950 as you can use two small disks on Raid 1 for the operating system and the other four disk slots for Raid 5 ( Use 2 to start with then add the other 2 later). If one of the Raid 1 disks fails you won't have any down time waiting for the replacment to arrive.

If your pocket would streach t0 3 server that would be better. 1 x 1950 for your SQL and IIS and the other for the rest.

I don't know about HP/Compaq servers as I have not been involved with them for a while.

Hope this helps
0
Creating Instructional Tutorials  

For Any Use & On Any Platform

Contextual Guidance at the moment of need helps your employees/users adopt software o& achieve even the most complex tasks instantly. Boost knowledge retention, software adoption & employee engagement with easy solution.

 
LVL 56

Assisted Solution

by:andyalder
andyalder earned 62 total points
ID: 18822969
If you're limited to 1U then DL360 G5 instead of DL380 G5. 6 disk slots available and SQL likes disks as much as it likes RAM. Similar CPUs available as the 380, a bit noisier but you won't care about that if it's in a hosting centre.

The integrated iLO2 is a boon in a hosting centre as long as you buy the advanced pack, then you can switch it on again if you accidentally shut it down and you can even make it boot from the CD in your remote workstation to install Windows or whatever remotely. Damn site better than relying on remote desktop.
0
 
LVL 4

Assisted Solution

by:AndrewCink
AndrewCink earned 62 total points
ID: 18848900
As far as price goes, I do not think anyone can beat Dell's pricing and availability. I've always been pleased. The 2950 is a good 2u server, I'd recommend outfitting it with as much redundancy as possible (dual power supplies, RAID 1 hard drives for reliability if money is a concern, RAID 5 if you can afford it is much better...) SCSI hard drives are better performance and reliability if you will be doing a lot of data access, but they cost more. SATA drives in a RAID 5 are super affordable though.

I just looked up, and as Gate said, it'd be nice to run a RAID 1 for OS and RAID 5 for data if you can swing it. The OS can run on SATA, and the data can be SATA or SAS (Serial attached SCSI, which is a fancy way of saying it's SCSI but uses a simpler SATA connector on the wires) SCSI is definitely better performance and reliability, but you pay for it.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:undyshelts
ID: 18871006
andyalder, you've got me very interested in this iLO2, the less time in the hosting center the better. Can I use this technology as a remote desktop replacement (can I access the windows GUI through it).

Cheers.
0

Featured Post

Optimize your web performance

What's in the eBook?
- Full list of reasons for poor performance
- Ultimate measures to speed things up
- Primary web monitoring types
- KPIs you should be monitoring in order to increase your ROI

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Usually shares are where we want them for our users and we tend to take them for granted. There are times, however, when those shares may disappear causing difficulty for your users. One of the first things to try is searching for files that shou…
Every server (virtual or physical) needs a console: and the console can be provided through hardware directly connected, software for remote connections, local connections, through a KVM, etc. This document explains the different types of consol…
NetCrunch network monitor is a highly extensive platform for network monitoring and alert generation. In this video you'll see a live demo of NetCrunch with most notable features explained in a walk-through manner. You'll also get to know the philos…
In this video you will find out how to export Office 365 mailboxes using the built in eDiscovery tool. Bear in mind that although this method might be useful in some cases, using PST files as Office 365 backup is troublesome in a long run (more on t…

630 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question