Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people, just like you, are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
Solved

Need help getting a WS-X6148A-GE-TX up in a 6506 with a WS-X6K-S2-MSFC2 sup engine

Posted on 2007-03-30
2
661 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-05
I am trying to get a Cisco WS-X6148A-GE-TX to come online in a 6506 chassis. I'm using a WS-X6K-S2-MSFC2 supervisor engine, and there is nothing else in the chassis aside from those 2 mods. The CatOS I'm running is cat6000-sup2cvk8.8-4-5.bin, which according to the cisco web site is compatible with the 6148. I keep getting syndiag errors though, and the switch will not come online, but gets powered down instead. Anyone have any ideas of what is happening? Thanks a lot


VarData
0
Comment
Question by:Vardata
2 Comments
 
LVL 2

Accepted Solution

by:
rrb31337 earned 500 total points
ID: 18825929
This sounds like an issue for TAC, as syndiags are an engineering function.  It's worth noting (I'm sure you already knew this) that CatOS 8.4 is the first CatOS to support that particular card.  Hopefully they didn't change hardware revisions and break certain older images.  If I had to wager a guess, I'd say that your GE card isn't compatible with the 6506 (non-E) chassis, although I can't find any documentation to confirm this.  But I'm still suspicious because the PSU limitation on 6506 is 2500 watts AFAIK, whereas the 6506-E's PSU limitation is 6000 watts.  The rationale is that you'll need the extra power to run SUP720 (not supported on the 6506) and PoE.  The PoE thing does raise another interesting question though - which PSU's are you using?  Perhaps the base 1300 watt PSUs alone are enough to cause this?  I've heard stories of strange happenings where it's not immediately clear what a problem is in the case of exhausted power resources.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Vardata
ID: 18826095
turns out we did need the 6509-E chassis, which fortunately we had one sitting around. We threw it in there and it works fine. Thanks for the suggestions
0

Featured Post

Announcing the Most Valuable Experts of 2016

MVEs are more concerned with the satisfaction of those they help than with the considerable points they can earn. They are the types of people you feel privileged to call colleagues. Join us in honoring this amazing group of Experts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Port 808 is being blocked 9 122
forward schedule of change and individual change comms 3 51
Cisco  3750E switches 1 28
Simultaneous work of Wi-Fi and LAN on Win10 laptop 4 58
There are two basic ways to configure a static route for Cisco IOS devices. I've written this article to highlight a case study comparing the configuration of a static route using the next-hop IP and the configuration of a static route using an outg…
David Varnum recently wrote up his impressions of PRTG, based on a presentation by my colleague Christian at Tech Field Day at VMworld in Barcelona. Thanks David, for your detailed and honest evaluation!
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
In this tutorial you'll learn about bandwidth monitoring with flows and packet sniffing with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're interested in additional methods for monitoring bandwidt…

839 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question