Switch: Combined Ports

Hello Experts,

I have a question in regards to linking two switches together.  Lets say I have two Catalyst switches, both are 3750's and I connected fa0/10, fa0/11and fa0/12 from SW1 to SW1 respectively.  Let say that each port is running at 100Mb.  Does this mean that the total link between the switches is 300 Mb?  If not, how can this be achieve via CAT5?  What commands do I need to read up?

As always, thank you in advance for your time on this matter.
LVL 1
coperatorAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

mdrichardsCommented:
Yep you certainly can, although with 3750's you'd wanna use the builtin backplane as it is much faster.

If you want to group standard ethernet ports together you want to set up an "EtherChannel"

You basically group fa0/10, 0/11 and 0/12 into a "channel-group" making them a virtual 300 Mb channel.

Check out the links below

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EtherChannel

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094647.shtml
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
>Does this mean that the total link between the switches is 300 Mb?

No. Spanning tree will block all but one link resulting in a single, operational 100mb link.

>If not, how can this be achieve via CAT5?

The closest you can come to doing that is etherchannel. However, Etherchannel groups must be 2, 4 or 8 links. If you try it with 3, the best outcome would be that only 2 of the links would carry traffic.

Even if you use a 4 port etherchannel group, it will still not give you a 400mb "pipe" between the switches. The traffic between two end devices (say A and B) that cross the etherchannel will use one of the 4 fastethernet links. The traffic between C and D may use a different link.

The bottom line is that etherchannel doesn't give you a faster path between two switches. It's really just a way of trying to get around spanning-tree blocking the redundant ports. At the end of the day, if you need more bandwidth, a faster link is the only way to go.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Switches / Hubs

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.