Solved

Switch:  Combined Ports

Posted on 2007-04-01
2
254 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-12
Hello Experts,

I have a question in regards to linking two switches together.  Lets say I have two Catalyst switches, both are 3750's and I connected fa0/10, fa0/11and fa0/12 from SW1 to SW1 respectively.  Let say that each port is running at 100Mb.  Does this mean that the total link between the switches is 300 Mb?  If not, how can this be achieve via CAT5?  What commands do I need to read up?

As always, thank you in advance for your time on this matter.
0
Comment
Question by:coperator
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 5

Accepted Solution

by:
mdrichards earned 250 total points
ID: 18834212
Yep you certainly can, although with 3750's you'd wanna use the builtin backplane as it is much faster.

If you want to group standard ethernet ports together you want to set up an "EtherChannel"

You basically group fa0/10, 0/11 and 0/12 into a "channel-group" making them a virtual 300 Mb channel.

Check out the links below

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EtherChannel

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094647.shtml
0
 
LVL 50

Assisted Solution

by:Don Johnston
Don Johnston earned 250 total points
ID: 18835556
>Does this mean that the total link between the switches is 300 Mb?

No. Spanning tree will block all but one link resulting in a single, operational 100mb link.

>If not, how can this be achieve via CAT5?

The closest you can come to doing that is etherchannel. However, Etherchannel groups must be 2, 4 or 8 links. If you try it with 3, the best outcome would be that only 2 of the links would carry traffic.

Even if you use a 4 port etherchannel group, it will still not give you a 400mb "pipe" between the switches. The traffic between two end devices (say A and B) that cross the etherchannel will use one of the 4 fastethernet links. The traffic between C and D may use a different link.

The bottom line is that etherchannel doesn't give you a faster path between two switches. It's really just a way of trying to get around spanning-tree blocking the redundant ports. At the end of the day, if you need more bandwidth, a faster link is the only way to go.
0

Featured Post

Get 15 Days FREE Full-Featured Trial

Benefit from a mission critical IT monitoring with Monitis Premium or get it FREE for your entry level monitoring needs.
-Over 200,000 users
-More than 300,000 websites monitored
-Used in 197 countries
-Recommended by 98% of users

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This tutorial will go through the steps required to write a script that will back up the configuration settings of a HP-ProCurve switch. You will need to get the following things to follow this tutorial: Telnet Scripting Tool e.g. TST10.exe …
WARNING:   If you follow the instructions here, you will wipe out your VTP and VLAN configurations.  Make sure you have backed up your switch!!! I recently had some issues with a few low-end Cisco routers (RV325) and I opened a case with Cisco TA…
NetCrunch network monitor is a highly extensive platform for network monitoring and alert generation. In this video you'll see a live demo of NetCrunch with most notable features explained in a walk-through manner. You'll also get to know the philos…
This tutorial will teach you the special effect of super speed similar to the fictional character Wally West aka "The Flash" After Shake : http://www.videocopilot.net/presets/after_shake/ All lightning effects with instructions : http://www.mediaf…

630 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question