Solved

Public folders vs. resource mailboxes

Posted on 2007-04-11
3
1,555 Views
Last Modified: 2008-08-12
I am looking on some clarification as to when to use a resource mailbox or a public folder.
Example:
User puts in a ticket for a mailbox to be created so that email can be sent to it and several people on her team will be able to access it and read and respond to the emails in there.  My first reaction to this is to use a public folder since you don't have to actually visit th users computers and add that second mailbox to their outlook.  Plus "thought" that an actual mailbox takes up much more resources then a public folder.

I just don't know if I am doing the right thing, is creating lots and lots of resources ok to do or is public folder the way to go and why.
0
Comment
Question by:harpoon70
3 Comments
 
LVL 1

Accepted Solution

by:
tim_storey earned 250 total points
ID: 18890603
I would suggest going down the Public Folder route. That way you don't have to use another license and you cna route mail direct to the folder just by mail enabling it.
Then you can set the permissions on the folder so that it is available to those who need to "see" it.
Have you though of using distribution groups instead or is the reply to address important?
0
 

Author Comment

by:harpoon70
ID: 18890740
Yes the reply to address is important in these circumstances. I totally agree with what your thought are on the PF route, and those are the reasons I have been going that way.
 My issue here is that I do not have all the priviledges necessary to create and manage the public folders. I can create them but need to send a ticket to corporate to have them mail enable it for me. I just realized that I cannot delete any public folder even if it is one that I created, I just tried to set "send as" permissions for a user and got access denied.  so with all these issues I just want to say "F, it" and create mailboxes which I have full rights to create and manage. but I just don't feel that mailboxes are the right thing to, so I guess I am looking for some more technical reasons why one is better than the other for the "Exchange environment" as a whole...  If there isn't much difference between using one over the other than I guess I will have no battle to fight and will just use mailboxes for these requests. just looking for some info to put in my arsenal for the battle to come..

Thanks alot for the help

Jeff
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

MS Outlook is a world-class email client application that is mainly used for e-communication globally.  In this article, we will discuss the basic idea about MS Outlook, its advanced features, and types of MS Outlook File formats.
As tax season makes its return, so does the increase in cyber crime and tax refund phishing that comes with it
Internet Business Fax to Email Made Easy - With eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com), you'll receive a dedicated online fax number, which is used the same way as a typical analog fax number. You'll receive secure faxes in your email, fr…
A short tutorial showing how to set up an email signature in Outlook on the Web (previously known as OWA). For free email signatures designs, visit https://www.mail-signatures.com/articles/signature-templates/?sts=6651 If you want to manage em…

726 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question