Server 2003 How many Processors

If I have a a Windows 2003 Server Standard can it run a system with 2 Quad Core Processors?
LVL 1
JaxBankerAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
Alan Huseyin KayahanCommented:
       Hi JaxBanker
             User in following post claims that he had 8 processors working (with 2 quad core) in std 2003 edition

http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Microsoft_Operating_Systems/Q_22506546.html

Hope he is right

Regards
0
 
Alan Huseyin KayahanCommented:
         Hi JaxBanker
               Yes it can run with 2 Quad Core Processors.

Regards
0
 
JaxBankerAuthor Commented:
But will it see all eight of the cores on the processors and utilize them if needed?
0
Cloud Class® Course: Microsoft Windows 7 Basic

This introductory course to Windows 7 environment will teach you about working with the Windows operating system. You will learn about basic functions including start menu; the desktop; managing files, folders, and libraries.

 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
It should.  Windows licensing is based on a per socket basis, not a per processor (though that old terminology still lingers).  A current version with appropriate service pack SHOULD see and use all 8 or 16 processing cores (assuming quad core with hyper threading).
0
 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
0
 
Alan Huseyin KayahanCommented:
         Hi JaxBanker
              If the question is "Can it run?" answer is "Yes". But if the question is "But will it see all eight of the cores on the processors and utilize them if needed?" then...
            Standard edition has 4-Way Symmetric Multiprocessing (SMP). So processes should be utilized between 4 ways. I recommend you Enterprise edition which has 8-Way SMP. And Datacenter edition supports 64-Way SMP.

Regards
0
 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
I have no dual quad-core servers to test with, but my understanding is that the Windows Server STandard SHOULD see and utilize ALL cores from both sockets.  Before you spend the money on enterprise, I would recommend you test this with a TechNet or MSDN copy of Standard server.  In the mean time, I will try to dig up more specific Microsoft documents to address this - though the one I provide a link to earlier implies I am correct.
0
 
JaxBankerAuthor Commented:
I appreciate all of your help. We just ordered the server yesterday and I didn't take into account the max processor's. Slipped my mind. I am still researching but I think that the server will work with it it seems but it doesn't look like the system will recognize all of the cores if I am correct in reading the responses. I have just e-mailed the manufacture who is building our server and hopefully they can get me a definite response in regards. I will post back with their answer.
0
 
JaxBankerAuthor Commented:
I was reading that there are bios setting that I can enable or disable that can turn hyper-threading on and off. If I were to turn hyper threading off and just run the 2 quad core processors that would allow me to keep the 8 core maximum that standard seems to be limited to. But Is this a waste of processing. Should I just downgrade the processors to 2 dual core Xeon processors and have hyper threading enabled?
0
 
Alan Huseyin KayahanCommented:
          Hi JaxBanker
                Yes there is a setting to disable HT but you DONT have to disable it. 2003 Standard is GOING TO run with your current CPUs. Do not perform any downgrades in your hardware. As I told you in theory. 4 way SMP may concern 1 Dualcore CPU x2 = 4 physical Cores, and if so, then you can all of your CPUs including HTs with all utilization.
0
 
JaxBankerAuthor Commented:
Thanks, I'll just keep the config that I have then like you suggested and run the 2003 standard.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.