Solved

Cisco Pix, ASA, FWSM or Checkpoint????

Posted on 2007-04-11
6
1,718 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-16
Can anyone tell me what the basic differences are between Cisco's Pix firewall, ASA device, and it's FWSM card?  I'm evaluating the replacement of my checkpoint firewall (very old) with a Cisco solution.  It's the classic argument between networking and security of speed vs. security. Can anyone offer any advice on the matter?
0
Comment
Question by:sunny10
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 79

Accepted Solution

by:
lrmoore earned 500 total points
ID: 18896798
ASA is the next-generation PIX with a modular architecture that allows you to add things like content filter (Websense on a card) to the appliance.
FWSM is a PIX firewall on a Catalyst 6500 switch blade. Designed for very high speed firewall features for data center more than for edge firewall.
I'm very partial to Cisco ASA for ease of use, performance, support and feature set for the price.
If I'm not mistaken, Checkpoint is a software firewal that you can now get pre-installed in an appliance. I have no direct experience with it, so I can't really comment on pros/cons.
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:Dooglave
ID: 18902639
Why do you want to replace the Check Point Firewall?  They have made some extraordinary advancements in the past few years that no one can even come close to.  Download the R65 version of SmartConsole and check it out in demo mode.
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:Dooglave
ID: 18902653
Oh you can get Check Point pre installed on the UTM-1 Server or you can install in on any platform you want. Windows, Solaris, Red Hat, Nokia IPSO, and Check Points OS SecurePlatform.
0
 

Author Comment

by:sunny10
ID: 18903316
I don't necessarily want to replace the Checkpoint.  I need to understand the firewall feature of each solution so I can formulate an argument on why we should keep CP.  The ones we have now are old, they will have to be upgraded or replaced.  Network wants throughput, hence the Cisco solution.
0

Featured Post

Transaction Monitoring Vs. Real User Monitoring

Synthetic Transaction Monitoring Vs. Real User Monitoring: When To Use Each Approach? In this article, we will discuss two major monitoring approaches: Synthetic Transaction and Real User Monitoring.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Quality of Service (QoS) options are nearly endless when it comes to networks today. This article is merely one example of how it can be handled in a hub-n-spoke design using a 3-tier configuration.
On Feb. 28, Amazon’s Simple Storage Service (S3) went down after an employee issued the wrong command during a debugging exercise. Among those affected were big names like Netflix, Spotify and Expedia.
As a trusted technology advisor to your customers you are likely getting the daily question of, ‘should I put this in the cloud?’ As customer demands for cloud services increases, companies will see a shift from traditional buying patterns to new…
Both in life and business – not all partnerships are created equal. Spend 30 short minutes with us to learn:   • Key questions to ask when considering a partnership to accelerate your business into the cloud • Pitfalls and mistakes other partners…

729 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question