Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of thomaszero
thomaszero

asked on

To RAS or not to RAS that is the question.

I have a multiple physcian office that I have inherited from a friend.  I was not there for the initial configuration of the network.  The network consists of a single 2003 Server box with 15 XP Pro clients.  The server is an application server running an EMR application for the office staff.  I was brought in due to a virus issue on the server which came from the Docs remotely accessing the Server, using MS Remote Desktop, and using it as a RAS.  The virus was first found on the server in a folder that belongs to one of the docs.  Needless to say this virus brought down the server and caused a complete work stoppage.  I have told the docs that I think that they should go with a RAS seperate from the application server and they are willing to spend the money for this box.  I would appreciate any information from anyone who has dealt with either a combined application and remote access box or two seperate boxes.  I have my own ideas about what should be done, seperate RA and application servers,  but I would appreciate any other information so I can do what would be best for the docs and their practice.

Thank you very much.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Rob Williams
Rob Williams
Flag of Canada image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial