Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of keneso
keneso

asked on

2003 editions difference

Hi,

what is the difference between:

SQ.60
SW OEM WINDOWS SERVER 2003 R2/A

SW.24
SW OEM WINDOWS SBS 2003 5 CAL DEVICE ADD

SW.27
SW OEM WINDOWS 2003 SERVER AD 5 CAL DEV

Why ms makes is so complicated? (it's rethorical)

Thank you
Avatar of Razwer
Razwer
Flag of Netherlands image

R2 is an updated version of 2003 with a tad different approach of AD, mixing 2003 and 2003 DC's will not work if the FSMO DC is not R2

SBS is limited to 75 users but includes an exchange license.
http://redmondmag.com/features/article.asp?EditorialsID=416

your last one is a regular 2003 version with 5 client access licenses suitable for active directory
SOLUTION
Avatar of LauraEHunterMVP
LauraEHunterMVP
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
that is a much better explenation than i gave. I tried to keep it simple. if he asks a question like this, i think explaining it like that is OTT for him, but instead of saying FSMO indeed i should have said AD Prep.
Avatar of keneso
keneso

ASKER

Oh well, I am now more confused ...

I am sorry, I should have said I am not familiar with network, and server terms.
Don't know what active directory is, and waht it serves, same for domain controllers, and FSMO (which I didn't get even what it stands for.

That is NOT your fault, but my ignorance.

Do you mind if I twist a bit the question?
I need to install a server to run 4-5 machines, giving them internet access, and file sharing, while installing an inventory/accoun ting/cataloguing software to be shared by all the clients, and make daily back-ups.

Considering that which of them is for the need?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of keneso

ASKER

Thanks.

>>recommend you do an active directory course first

I might look into it, but right now, someone else is going to do it, I just want to know what he is doing, as the price difference is quite a bit between the 3 versions.

Just to be on the safe side, did I understand correctly that ANY of these 3 versions would suit my needs, and that I can safely go with the cheaper one, as all I need is what I said in the previous post?
correct. only thing which your post did not say with the R2 is weither it has 5 CALs
You will need the CALs to legally have your clients connect to the server.
Also, make sure that its not JUST a CAL package. Sometimes they trick you like that being unclear in how they write it down. 2003 server R2 + 5 CALs costs about 650 euros while just 5 CALs cost about 100 euros.
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
And Im pretty sure there is a standard and premium version of 2003 SBS

Might I suggest finding out exactly from your seller what each is and then asking for a comparison so all can better assist you.

zf
the thing is, 2003 server is never supplied without at least 5 CALs
SBS is even trickier as the base package costs about the same with 5 CALs as an additional 5 CALs as far as i checked pricelists.
SBS is cheapest, unless you use more than 5 users.
Avatar of keneso

ASKER

Thnak you all.