We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

shall I keep SBS or Upgrade?

Last Modified: 2010-04-20
Good Day,
My company is running a SBS2003 domain. The same SBS includes my DC, DNS, DHCP, AD, Exchange, File & Print, Sharepoint and SQL server features. Now if I am to expand the company over different locations and add two more branches; is it wise to keep SBS with out upgrading to Standard server 2003, purchase all the licenses of the different products and get servers running on each location. Now I have already opened another branch and connected them through a 512KB MPLS link and the link is not sufficient as it always fails to cover our load.
Now my question is if I need all these features and I am plannign to expand but the number of my users are not going to exceed 50 users; what would be the best practice according to your expertise and according to Microsoft Recomendations?
Thank you for your adherence and responce.
Watch Question

If the number of users is not going to exceed 75 then I would stick with SBS and have a server on each remote site (you don't need to run a DC on remote site unless you want additional remote Exchange server but I can't see why you need one with your user base) . The reason your link drops is probably because of the bandwidth on the link itself - you can get somethine like an "Always on" VPN link between the sites.

One of the disadvantages to upgrade (to standard 2003 server) is the cost factor - cost of OS and cost of licence. If you are doing the upgrade, you need to purchase the OS and software (Windows 2003, Exchange 2003, SQL and Sharepoint). THen you need licences on EACH (except Win2003 server as I think you can transfer your current sbs licences but I am not sure about this you need to chexck with M$) and I can tell you Exchange CALs and SQL CALs are VERY expensive.

Expert of the Year 2007
Expert of the Year 2006

If you have SBS and want to go to full product then you can purchase a transition pack. This turns what you have in to the full product, including CALs, which can reduce the cost.

What do the remote sites need ON SITE? Can they connect back to the home office for most things?
For example, if everything is on the home office server/s then you could look at using terminal services. The remote sites would just need thin clients and would connect back to a terminal server in the office. That terminal server would have everything that they need on it and it would make things easier for you to maintain, everything on a central server rather than scattered about.

Brian PiercePhotographer
Awarded 2007
Top Expert 2008

My advice would be to stick with SBS server if you have no reason to change, the only reasons I can see for wanting to change is if you:

Plan to have more than 75 users
Need to have multiple Domains or trusts

You could always use thin clients with TS as Sembee suggests or alternatively (though more expensive) you can place additional domain controllers on the other sites to localise DNS, DHCP and authentication and to some extent data storage.


Hi everyone,
Thanks alot for the solid information.
I really want to stick to SBS as it is much easier to manage. The problem is in the region I am in the ISPS provide network connections that are unstable thus unreliable. I would defenitly go for a server on each site but what are my chances for disaster recovery, data replication and data storage.
Expert of the Year 2007
Expert of the Year 2006

If you go for SBS on each site then you have very little options with regards to data replication because SBS is not supposed to talk to anything else - certainly not another SBS server. It doesn't trust anything else.

Once you get in to multi site environments you really should be moving to full products - SBS is not designed for that kind of deployment.

Principal Consultant
Most Valuable Expert 2016
Top Expert 2014
Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)


Good Day,
TechSoEasy I think your solution is the best I have heard off till now. I am very interested in your solution and I would be very gratefull if you would forward explicit details of the implementations in one of the branches infact any data you can provide and exactly how did the data replication work.  I would also need any contacts or techinical  support that was helping in the setup.

My email Address is:                             ***REMOVED BY TECHSOEASY -- EE'S MICROSOFT ZONE ADVISOR***

Thanks & Regards,


I appologies for that I wasn't aware of the Expert-Exchange rules and regulations.
But thanks for the information and I must say that I will work on the solution provided by you. If you think there is any more sites that could help as a reference please refer them on this post.
thanks again

Gain unlimited access to on-demand training courses with an Experts Exchange subscription.

Get Access
Why Experts Exchange?

Experts Exchange always has the answer, or at the least points me in the correct direction! It is like having another employee that is extremely experienced.

Jim Murphy
Programmer at Smart IT Solutions

When asked, what has been your best career decision?

Deciding to stick with EE.

Mohamed Asif
Technical Department Head

Being involved with EE helped me to grow personally and professionally.

Carl Webster
CTP, Sr Infrastructure Consultant
Empower Your Career
Did You Know?

We've partnered with two important charities to provide clean water and computer science education to those who need it most. READ MORE

Ask ANY Question

Connect with Certified Experts to gain insight and support on specific technology challenges including:

  • Troubleshooting
  • Research
  • Professional Opinions
Unlock the solution to this question.
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Please provide your email to receive a sample view!

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.


Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.