WestcountryBusiness
asked on
Windows CE 5.0 - Can I edit a datagrid or bind text fields to a dataset?
I've been developing a stock control system using VS2003 & MS SQL 2005. Now I need to add the option to use Bar Code scanners.
The Bar Code Scanners are Windows CE5.0 devices with inbuilt wireless networking. I have upgraded to VS2005 for this project as I understand its better suited to this task, so am also getting used to new environment.
I can build & deploy an app that reads direct from the MS SQL DB. I've not installed SQL CE as I seem to be able to access the DB direct. I can fill a datagrid with the contents of a table, so that's all fine.
I want to be able to update the DB. The datagrid is editable, which I believe is the case - is that correct. I have added Text Boxes to the form, but there does appear to be a datasource option.
Problem is, I'm just not sure I'm approaching this correctly. Should I be installing SQL CE? Is there an updatable datagrid option?
I will be working in an environment where the wireless link may fail occassionally and so would like to store updates locally if no connection & then update in batch when I can get a connection. That sounds to me like writing to a local dataset & then performing an update() as & when. I guess I could create a form that adds / amends rows in the dataset & configure a data adapter to update the dataset - but is that the best approach.
I'm likely to be spending a lot of time in the near future on this project - so just after a 'heads up' really. Am I on the right lines? Any tips / advise greatly received.
Jon
The Bar Code Scanners are Windows CE5.0 devices with inbuilt wireless networking. I have upgraded to VS2005 for this project as I understand its better suited to this task, so am also getting used to new environment.
I can build & deploy an app that reads direct from the MS SQL DB. I've not installed SQL CE as I seem to be able to access the DB direct. I can fill a datagrid with the contents of a table, so that's all fine.
I want to be able to update the DB. The datagrid is editable, which I believe is the case - is that correct. I have added Text Boxes to the form, but there does appear to be a datasource option.
Problem is, I'm just not sure I'm approaching this correctly. Should I be installing SQL CE? Is there an updatable datagrid option?
I will be working in an environment where the wireless link may fail occassionally and so would like to store updates locally if no connection & then update in batch when I can get a connection. That sounds to me like writing to a local dataset & then performing an update() as & when. I guess I could create a form that adds / amends rows in the dataset & configure a data adapter to update the dataset - but is that the best approach.
I'm likely to be spending a lot of time in the near future on this project - so just after a 'heads up' really. Am I on the right lines? Any tips / advise greatly received.
Jon
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
I can create a form using Text Fields to display / edit data. This aren't bound to the dataset but this can be done manually:
eg: Assuming I have a combobox with a data source of the Addresses table in my dataset and I just want to select an account from the drop down & then display / update the Full Name field. If the Full Name is changed, then I press the Save button to save to dataset: (dataset is filled on load)
Private Sub ComboBox1_SelectedIndexCha
fld_FullName.Text = MyDataSet.Addresses.Item(C
End Sub
Private Sub BtnSave_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles BtnSave.Click
MyDataSet.Addresses.Item(C
End Sub
I can then use the dataadapter Update to write the changes to the dataset back to the SQL DB. I can see this would work & isn't too much work to do (after all, its a windows CE device - the screens only big enough to display a handful of fields anyway!).
So, unless I hear otherwise, that's the approach I'll take. However, I'd still be happy to hear from anyone who could either suggest a better way - or maybe just confirm that this is the right way.