Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of garystark
garystarkFlag for Afghanistan

asked on

virtual file server?

I'm converting several of our servers into virtual machines (free version of VMWare Server).  One of these machines has about 60 GB of shared files, basically a small file server.  The conversion went fine and it runs fine, but of course this makes for a fairly fat virtual machine.  I'm wondering if I should add a second physical drive to the virtual machine and move the shared files over to it.  That way the virtual machine itself wouldn't be so large.

(I ask this because my gut feeling is that storing LOTS of files into this virtual single file might be asking for trouble...a single file corruption could wipe out all the shared files contained within.)

gary
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of that1guy15
that1guy15
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of garystark

ASKER

That1guy15,

So is the snapshot like doing incremental backups?  Is the very first snapshot extra large because it's not based on changes?

gary
When you snapshot a vm it creates a flat file of the vm (very small).

here is an article that gives an overview of snapshots

http://www.vmware.com/support/gsx3/doc/preserve_snapshot_gsx.html

Now i know snapshots are supported with server just not all the functionality of ESX.

I would not rely on snapshots as a means of backing up because it is only a flat file of the vmdk file. you will still need a good copy of this file to revert a snapshot. without it the snapshot is useless