What significance does duo core and quad core CPU mean?

Posted on 2007-10-15
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2013-12-10
When I source hardware for my server upgrade, I am confused by the duo core and quad core CPUs. Originally my CPU is duo core Intel Xeon 3.0GHz. Later the supplier quote me on quad core Intel Xeon 2.0GHz with lower price.
Q#1. What advantages does a duo/quad core CPU have over single core CPU?
Q#2. Is dual CPU better than single CPU with duo core given same brand and speed?
Q#3. Under what situations does a duo core/quad core CPU have performance advantage over single core CPU?
Q#4. How do I estimate the over performance with my two CPU configuration - duo core 3.0GHz vs quad core 2.0GHz?
Q#5. Any adivce on how to choose from these single/duo/quad core CPU?
Thanks a lot.
Question by:richtree
  • 3

Accepted Solution

jamesaskham earned 2000 total points
ID: 20078849
Hi Richtree,

1) Depends, if an application is written to take advantage of multiple cores (a multi-threaded program) then the advantage can be massive. Even if the application isn't written for multiple cores, the OS can still take advantage of this by using 1 core for the application and the other (or others) for background tasks. Overall, you'd be wise to get at least a dual core system at the moment (as more and more programs are being written to be multi-threaded).
2) Interesting one, Dual CPU will be faster in this scenario. See this link for more details: http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=23
3) Situations where applications are multi-threaded or where you are running lots of applications at the same time will all benefit from multiple cores. At the moment you really shouldn't be looking at a single core server solution if you can afford dual core.
4) This will depend, if an application can take advantage of 4 cores (few and far between at the moment but will increase in time) then the quad core will be quicker, in the short-term you will probably find the dual core to be quicker in applications that are only designed for two cores. It's a bit of short-term long term really, I would still go for the quad core myself.
5) From what you've said I would go for a Quad Core solution, as it seems the be long term solution.

Any more questions, feel free to ask.

Assisted Solution

jamesaskham earned 2000 total points
ID: 20078866

http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000942.html - This site has some clear information on Dual Core vs Quad Core.

http://videoediting.digitalmedianet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=83846 -> Good article on a direct comparison.


Author Comment

ID: 20078964
Very good links. It's not a mist any more.

Expert Comment

ID: 20078976
No problem.

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article applies to This article will be of use if you are the owner / supporter of any computer that comes with a discrete graphics card from nVidia / ATI Radeon (Now owned by AMD) or any embedded graphics solution and need to upgrade the gr…
On September 18, Experts Exchange launched the first installment of the Help Bell, a new feature for Premium Members, Team Accounts, and Qualified Experts. The Help Bell will serve as an additional tool to help teams increase question visibility.
Integration Management Part 2
Exchange organizations may use the Journaling Agent of the Transport Service to archive messages going through Exchange. However, if the Transport Service is integrated with some email content management application (such as an anti-spam), the admin…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month17 days, 6 hours left to enroll

864 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question