Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium


Outlook 2003 Users in Cached Mode Do Not See GAL Updates Unless You Manually Delete OAB Files and Edit Registry

Posted on 2007-10-17
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2008-04-23
We are having a strange problem with our Outlook users who are using Outlook in Cached Mode. The Global Address List does not accurately reflect additions or subtractions of users even after 48 hours and manually updating.

After troubleshooting the problem, I found the problem to be only with users who are using Outlook in Cached Mode because users that are not in Cached mode see the changes instantly once I refresh and rebuild using Receipient Update Services.

The only way I can get Outlook Cached Mode users to see this change is to go through the tedious process of deleting all of the *.OAB files on their computer, and also adding the following registry entry

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\11.0\Outlook\Cached Mode]

It just seems like there is something buggy or wrong here.
Question by:FASTECHS
  • 2

Expert Comment

ID: 20095630
Are you on an older version of Outlook by chance, that may need some patching?
LVL 104

Expert Comment

ID: 20096463
The registry key simply stops the client from downloading the GAL - it uses live information instead. That doesn't actually fix the problem.
I suspect that your OAB is not generating properly, or there is another problem with the OAB distribution.

Therefore the first thing I would do is attempt to force the OAB to regenerate and look for errors and also check that the OAB system folders have a content count that is not 0.


If your question has been answered, please remember to accept the answer and close the question.

Author Comment

ID: 20100056
How do I force the OABs to regenerate?
LVL 104

Accepted Solution

Sembee earned 1500 total points
ID: 20104433
In ESM, Recipients, Offline Address Book, right click on the default and choose Rebuild.


If your question has been answered, please remember to accept the answer and close the question.

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Microsoft Jet database engine errors can crop up out of nowhere to disrupt the working of the Exchange server. Decoding why a particular error occurs goes a long way in determining the right solution for it.
As a matter of fact, Outlook OST files are of much importance in relation to Exchange mailbox. OST files are independent as they are simply copy of data of a user’s mailbox on Exchange Server. Though, if the server’s status is changed or it is dama…
This tutorial gives a high-level tour of the interface of Marketo (a marketing automation tool to help businesses track and engage prospective customers and drive them to purchase). You will see the main areas including Marketing Activities, Design …
As many of you are aware about Scanpst.exe utility which is owned by Microsoft itself to repair inaccessible or damaged PST files, but the question is do you really think Scanpst.exe is capable to repair all sorts of PST related corruption issues?
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month11 days, 4 hours left to enroll

572 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question