Solved

Exchange 2003 on vmware ESX 3.0.2 or not ?

Posted on 2007-11-14
4
1,046 Views
Last Modified: 2008-02-25
Hi all

I have an exchange 2003 SP2 in a active/passive cluster environment.
Because we are using fiber and veritas enterprise manager to go to our san storage on netapp (which is not supported by netapp), we are planning to migrate to something else.
We have two options to do this:

Option1:
Install a new exchange 2003 cluster on new hardware and using iscsi to connect to our netapp storage. We also want to use snapdrive and snapmanager for exchange (netapp products).

Option2:
Install exchange 2003 on our vmware environment as a single server (no cluster) and use Vmotion, HA, ... to "replace" the cluster.
We have ESX 3.0.2 and connecting to our storage with NFS.


Which option would you guys prefer and why ?

Thanks,
Robin
0
Comment
Question by:Geert Bettens
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 6

Assisted Solution

by:AbhijeetNigam
AbhijeetNigam earned 50 total points
ID: 20279845
I would suggest option one is good keeping performance in mind. I dont recommend keeping production on virtual environment untill we have a very less number of users
0
 
LVL 1

Assisted Solution

by:ParvinderSohal
ParvinderSohal earned 50 total points
ID: 20279869
I would stick with option 1. for better performance.
0
 
LVL 21

Accepted Solution

by:
robocat earned 200 total points
ID: 20280032
This is a well kept secret, but NFS actually outperforms iSCSI on VMWare by 30% to 45% if all else is kept the same. We can testify to this.

Is some cases NFS can even outperform Fibre Channel.

There are 2 reasons for this, the elimination of the slow VMFS filesystem (replaced by WAFL) and the fact that there's no longer a single I/O queue for each datastore.

Google for keywords: netapp nfs vmware datastore
This is currently a hot topic on lots of sites.
0
 
LVL 22

Assisted Solution

by:ATIG
ATIG earned 200 total points
ID: 20280261
You can look at my blog to see who I work with.......

even if going to vmware  vmotion give the ability to move the box while running,
HA is more of failover but could take 20 minutes to kick in...

with that said  vmware is a great solution but remember MS does not 100% support virtualisation of Exchange and if you run into problem may be ask to build a physical machine.

0

Featured Post

Migrating Your Company's PCs

To keep pace with competitors, businesses must keep employees productive, and that means providing them with the latest technology. This document provides the tips and tricks you need to help you migrate an outdated PC fleet to new desktops, laptops, and tablets.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

MS Outlook is a world-class email client application that is mainly used for e-communication globally.  In this article, we will discuss the basic idea about MS Outlook, its advanced features, and types of MS Outlook File formats.
In-place Upgrading Dirsync to Azure AD Connect
This Micro Tutorial walks you through using a remote console to access a server and install ESXi 5.1. This example is showing remote access and installation using a Dell server. The hypervisor is the very first component of your virtual infrastructu…
This video shows you how easy it is to boot from ISO images for virtual machines with the ISO images stored on a local datastore on the ESXi host.

749 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question