Solved

Exchange 2003 on vmware ESX 3.0.2 or not ?

Posted on 2007-11-14
4
1,043 Views
Last Modified: 2008-02-25
Hi all

I have an exchange 2003 SP2 in a active/passive cluster environment.
Because we are using fiber and veritas enterprise manager to go to our san storage on netapp (which is not supported by netapp), we are planning to migrate to something else.
We have two options to do this:

Option1:
Install a new exchange 2003 cluster on new hardware and using iscsi to connect to our netapp storage. We also want to use snapdrive and snapmanager for exchange (netapp products).

Option2:
Install exchange 2003 on our vmware environment as a single server (no cluster) and use Vmotion, HA, ... to "replace" the cluster.
We have ESX 3.0.2 and connecting to our storage with NFS.


Which option would you guys prefer and why ?

Thanks,
Robin
0
Comment
Question by:Geert Bettens
4 Comments
 
LVL 6

Assisted Solution

by:AbhijeetNigam
AbhijeetNigam earned 50 total points
ID: 20279845
I would suggest option one is good keeping performance in mind. I dont recommend keeping production on virtual environment untill we have a very less number of users
0
 
LVL 1

Assisted Solution

by:ParvinderSohal
ParvinderSohal earned 50 total points
ID: 20279869
I would stick with option 1. for better performance.
0
 
LVL 21

Accepted Solution

by:
robocat earned 200 total points
ID: 20280032
This is a well kept secret, but NFS actually outperforms iSCSI on VMWare by 30% to 45% if all else is kept the same. We can testify to this.

Is some cases NFS can even outperform Fibre Channel.

There are 2 reasons for this, the elimination of the slow VMFS filesystem (replaced by WAFL) and the fact that there's no longer a single I/O queue for each datastore.

Google for keywords: netapp nfs vmware datastore
This is currently a hot topic on lots of sites.
0
 
LVL 22

Assisted Solution

by:ATIG
ATIG earned 200 total points
ID: 20280261
You can look at my blog to see who I work with.......

even if going to vmware  vmotion give the ability to move the box while running,
HA is more of failover but could take 20 minutes to kick in...

with that said  vmware is a great solution but remember MS does not 100% support virtualisation of Exchange and if you run into problem may be ask to build a physical machine.

0

Featured Post

Backup Your Microsoft Windows Server®

Backup all your Microsoft Windows Server – on-premises, in remote locations, in private and hybrid clouds. Your entire Windows Server will be backed up in one easy step with patented, block-level disk imaging. We achieve RTOs (recovery time objectives) as low as 15 seconds.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

HOW TO: Install and Configure VMware vSphere Hypervisor 6.5 (ESXi 6.5), Step by Step Tutorial with screenshots. From Download, Checking Media, to Completed Installation.
In this step by step tutorial with screenshots, we will show you HOW TO: Enable SSH Remote Access on a VMware vSphere Hypervisor 6.5 (ESXi 6.5). This is important if you need to enable SSH remote access for additional troubleshooting of the ESXi hos…
Teach the user how to install log collectors and how to configure ESXi 5.5 for remote logging Open console session and mount vCenter Server installer: Install vSphere Core Dump Collector: Install vSphere Syslog Collector: Open vSphere Client: Config…
This video demonstrates how to sync Microsoft Exchange Public Folders with smartphones using CodeTwo Exchange Sync and Exchange ActiveSync. To learn more about CodeTwo Exchange Sync and download the free trial, go to: http://www.codetwo.com/excha…

920 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

16 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now