Solved

Exchange 2003 on vmware ESX 3.0.2 or not ?

Posted on 2007-11-14
4
1,048 Views
Last Modified: 2008-02-25
Hi all

I have an exchange 2003 SP2 in a active/passive cluster environment.
Because we are using fiber and veritas enterprise manager to go to our san storage on netapp (which is not supported by netapp), we are planning to migrate to something else.
We have two options to do this:

Option1:
Install a new exchange 2003 cluster on new hardware and using iscsi to connect to our netapp storage. We also want to use snapdrive and snapmanager for exchange (netapp products).

Option2:
Install exchange 2003 on our vmware environment as a single server (no cluster) and use Vmotion, HA, ... to "replace" the cluster.
We have ESX 3.0.2 and connecting to our storage with NFS.


Which option would you guys prefer and why ?

Thanks,
Robin
0
Comment
Question by:Geert Bettens
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 6

Assisted Solution

by:AbhijeetNigam
AbhijeetNigam earned 50 total points
ID: 20279845
I would suggest option one is good keeping performance in mind. I dont recommend keeping production on virtual environment untill we have a very less number of users
0
 
LVL 1

Assisted Solution

by:ParvinderSohal
ParvinderSohal earned 50 total points
ID: 20279869
I would stick with option 1. for better performance.
0
 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
robocat earned 200 total points
ID: 20280032
This is a well kept secret, but NFS actually outperforms iSCSI on VMWare by 30% to 45% if all else is kept the same. We can testify to this.

Is some cases NFS can even outperform Fibre Channel.

There are 2 reasons for this, the elimination of the slow VMFS filesystem (replaced by WAFL) and the fact that there's no longer a single I/O queue for each datastore.

Google for keywords: netapp nfs vmware datastore
This is currently a hot topic on lots of sites.
0
 
LVL 22

Assisted Solution

by:ATIG
ATIG earned 200 total points
ID: 20280261
You can look at my blog to see who I work with.......

even if going to vmware  vmotion give the ability to move the box while running,
HA is more of failover but could take 20 minutes to kick in...

with that said  vmware is a great solution but remember MS does not 100% support virtualisation of Exchange and if you run into problem may be ask to build a physical machine.

0

Featured Post

Comparison of Amazon Drive, Google Drive, OneDrive

What is Best for Backup: Amazon Drive, Google Drive or MS OneDrive? In this free whitepaper we look at their performance, pricing, and platform availability to help you decide which cloud drive is right for your situation. Download and read the results of our testing for free!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article explains how to install and use the NTBackup utility that comes with Windows Server.
This article will help to fix the below error for MS Exchange server 2010 I. Out Of office not working II. Certificate error "name on the security certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site" III. Make Internal URLs and External…
To add imagery to an HTML email signature, you have two options available to you. You can either add a logo/image by embedding it directly into the signature or hosting it externally and linking to it. The vast majority of email clients display l…
How to Install VMware Tools in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4 (RHEL 6.4) Step-by-Step Tutorial

691 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question