Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of rlocone
rlocone

asked on

recommended partition sizes.

Hello All!

I had to re-build my server.  I don't think I had my partition set correctly.  What do you recommend with the following system concerning partition sizes.

AMD 64 XP 3400
Ram 1GB
1 x 20g hdd
1 x 123g hdd
2 x 500g already in raid 0
1 x 500g usb hdd

I want to use the server for following:

1 x web server (apache, mysql php) low traffic, internal / external
2 x pptp, external
3 x ftp, internal / external
4 x syslog server (mysql, phplogcon) phpmyadmin
5 x either samba or NFS, which ever is better!
6 x backup rsysc, backup worktations to usb hdd

I *DON'T* WANT TO FORMAT OF EVEN TOUCH THE RAID!!!!!!!!!

Thanks in advance
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of lnkevin
lnkevin
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of rlocone
rlocone

ASKER

thanks for your recommendation.  The webserver is a home server nothing major.  As for the raid I did that way for the space.  In the future I want to add more drives to the RAID.  I know the raid doesn't have reduncacy so that is why I would use the rsysc to backup files I know I DON'T want to lose.  If there was a way to use raid 1 with out give up the space I would.

Am I reading you correctly with the setup below?
/var/log = 20g hdd
/boot, /, home, usr, tmp, swap = 123g hdd
/boot = 100mb, swap = 1.3g

The setup looks OK to me.
OK. If that is what you prefered, you are good to go. Question on the backup:
Assume you will have your data going up to 60% on 1 TB disk, how do you back it up to the 500GB  USB drive? What exactly do you want to backup on your USB?

K
Avatar of rlocone

ASKER

thank you.

Backup: I was thinking of rsysc for backup files from workstation and files the RAID that are modified (e.g. documents)  I know that if I had used raid 1 I would have to worry about backing anything up from the RAID.  For now I'll use this til I'm able to get the space for the RAID 1 setup.

I was using Samba for sharing with Windows clients.  They would pull files to and from the RAID.  Is NFS better then Samba?
If you have windows client, Samba is the way to do. NFS is not mature up to the level that you can implement with Windows client. So Samba is better in your case.

K
Avatar of rlocone

ASKER

Everything is up and running now and my RAID is intact.  K.  I'll use Samba.  I have it already installed.
I know that if I had used raid 1 I would have to worry about backing anything ....

Keep in mind that whenever you have RAID 1 implemented, you still want to backup your data. RAID 1 mirror set only works when you have 1 good and 1 bad drive. If you have 2 bad drives at a time ( I know it's odd, but it happpens sometime), you need another option which is backup.

K