Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

recommended partition sizes.

Posted on 2007-11-14
7
Medium Priority
?
1,520 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-16
Hello All!

I had to re-build my server.  I don't think I had my partition set correctly.  What do you recommend with the following system concerning partition sizes.

AMD 64 XP 3400
Ram 1GB
1 x 20g hdd
1 x 123g hdd
2 x 500g already in raid 0
1 x 500g usb hdd

I want to use the server for following:

1 x web server (apache, mysql php) low traffic, internal / external
2 x pptp, external
3 x ftp, internal / external
4 x syslog server (mysql, phplogcon) phpmyadmin
5 x either samba or NFS, which ever is better!
6 x backup rsysc, backup worktations to usb hdd

I *DON'T* WANT TO FORMAT OF EVEN TOUCH THE RAID!!!!!!!!!

Thanks in advance
0
Comment
Question by:rlocone
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 3
7 Comments
 
LVL 26

Accepted Solution

by:
lnkevin earned 2000 total points
ID: 20283539
*DON'T* WANT TO FORMAT OF EVEN TOUCH THE RAID!!!!!!!!!

Despite of the above message, I will recommend you to reconfigure RAID to be RAID1. You have 2X500GB = 1TB? For a web server, this is too much space without redundancy. RAID 0 could not take advantage of RAID purpose (failover) so if one SCSI drive is dead, you loose all your data. RAID1 mirror disk is different. If one drive is dead you still up and run with other drive so you can have time to replace a failed drive to rebuild your RAID 1.

Partition usage:
- Put all yours web server (apache, mysql php), either samba or NFS in RAID1
- Put all logs in 20GB
- Put backup on 500g usb hdd
- Other miscellaneous in the remaining drive

K
0
 

Author Comment

by:rlocone
ID: 20283625
thanks for your recommendation.  The webserver is a home server nothing major.  As for the raid I did that way for the space.  In the future I want to add more drives to the RAID.  I know the raid doesn't have reduncacy so that is why I would use the rsysc to backup files I know I DON'T want to lose.  If there was a way to use raid 1 with out give up the space I would.

Am I reading you correctly with the setup below?
/var/log = 20g hdd
/boot, /, home, usr, tmp, swap = 123g hdd
/boot = 100mb, swap = 1.3g

0
 
LVL 26

Expert Comment

by:lnkevin
ID: 20283883
The setup looks OK to me.
OK. If that is what you prefered, you are good to go. Question on the backup:
Assume you will have your data going up to 60% on 1 TB disk, how do you back it up to the 500GB  USB drive? What exactly do you want to backup on your USB?

K
0
Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 

Author Comment

by:rlocone
ID: 20283918
thank you.

Backup: I was thinking of rsysc for backup files from workstation and files the RAID that are modified (e.g. documents)  I know that if I had used raid 1 I would have to worry about backing anything up from the RAID.  For now I'll use this til I'm able to get the space for the RAID 1 setup.

I was using Samba for sharing with Windows clients.  They would pull files to and from the RAID.  Is NFS better then Samba?
0
 
LVL 26

Expert Comment

by:lnkevin
ID: 20285301
If you have windows client, Samba is the way to do. NFS is not mature up to the level that you can implement with Windows client. So Samba is better in your case.

K
0
 

Author Comment

by:rlocone
ID: 20285332
Everything is up and running now and my RAID is intact.  K.  I'll use Samba.  I have it already installed.
0
 
LVL 26

Expert Comment

by:lnkevin
ID: 20285523
I know that if I had used raid 1 I would have to worry about backing anything ....

Keep in mind that whenever you have RAID 1 implemented, you still want to backup your data. RAID 1 mirror set only works when you have 1 good and 1 bad drive. If you have 2 bad drives at a time ( I know it's odd, but it happpens sometime), you need another option which is backup.

K
0

Featured Post

Three Reasons Why Backup is Strategic

Backup is strategic to your business because your data is strategic to your business. Without backup, your business will fail. This white paper explains why it is vital for you to design and immediately execute a backup strategy to protect 100 percent of your data.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Hyper-convergence systems have taken the IT world by storm and have quickly started to change our point of view of how the data center should and could be architected. In this article, I’ll explain the benefits of employing a hyper-converged system …
Moving your enterprise fax infrastructure from in-house fax machines and servers to the cloud makes sense — from both an efficiency and productivity standpoint. But does migrating to a cloud fax solution mean you will no longer be able to send or re…
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.
In this video, Percona Solutions Engineer Barrett Chambers discusses some of the basic syntax differences between MySQL and MongoDB. To learn more check out our webinar on MongoDB administration for MySQL DBA: https://www.percona.com/resources/we…
Suggested Courses

705 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question