Want to win a PS4? Go Premium and enter to win our High-Tech Treats giveaway. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Can I make a route to a class B instead of the actual bunch of class Cs?

Posted on 2007-11-20
2
Medium Priority
?
285 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-23
I have a RHEL5 server that needs static routes to a bunch of class C subnets (192.168.*.0).  Right now I am using this:

route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.16.20.1
route add -net 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.16.20.1
route add -net 192.168.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.16.20.1
route add -net 192.168.4.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.16.20.1
route add -net 192.168.5.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.16.20.1
route add -net 192.168.6.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.16.20.1
route add -net 192.168.7.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.16.20.1
route add -net 192.168.8.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.16.20.1
route add -net 192.168.9.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.16.20.1
route add -net 192.168.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.16.20.1

...but I was wondering, can I just use this?:
route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 gw 172.16.20.1

I know the broadcast and network addresses will be different if I treat it like a Class B, but for the sake of routing, will it even make a difference?  As far as I can tell, the route should lead me to the same gateway, and once I'm there I should be good, right?

Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:kamermans
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
Spot_The_Cat earned 2000 total points
ID: 20319144
Yes you can but keep it in mind that some routers do not like supernetting addresses so if you introduce a hardware router to take care of this in the future then it may well complain and you may need to revert to the 255.255.255.0 mask. You could route based on this though:

route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.240.0 gw 172.16.20.1

Which would limit the route to 192.168.0.x to 192.168.15.x

Hope that helps.
0
 
LVL 13

Author Closing Comment

by:kamermans
ID: 31410096
Works like a charm - thanks Spot!
0

Featured Post

Simplify Your Workload with One Tool

How do you combat today’s intelligent hacker while managing multiple domains and platforms? By simplifying your workload with one tool. With Lunarpages hosting through Plesk Onyx, you can:

Automate SSL generation and installation with two clicks
Experience total server control

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Most of the applications these days are on Cloud. Cloud is ubiquitous with many service providers in the market. Since it has many benefits such as cost reduction, software updates, remote access, disaster recovery and much more.
This article is in regards to the Cisco QSFP-4SFP10G-CU1M cables, which are designed to uplink/downlink 40GB ports to 10GB SFP ports. I recently experienced this and found very little configuration documentation on how these are supposed to be confi…
Internet Business Fax to Email Made Easy - With  eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com), you'll receive a dedicated online fax number, which is used the same way as a typical analog fax number. You'll receive secure faxes in your email, f…
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.

636 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question