Nonhomogeneous second order difference equation

x(n+1) - 4x(n) + 3x(n-1) = 36n^2

What form will the particular solution take?

I tried x(n)=an^2+bn+c, but when I plugged it in, I got a 0 coefficient for the n^2 terms on the LHS.
What is an alternative to try?

Thanks
LVL 2
Beta07Asked:
Who is Participating?
 
ozoCommented:
a*b^n + c*n^3 + d*n^2 + e*n + f
0
 
aburrCommented:
It has been a while since I have worked with difference equations but the following two reference might be of help.

Recurrence relation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A difference equation is a specific type of recurrence relation. ... Certain difference equations can be solved using z-transforms. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recurrence_relation - 50k - Cached - Similar pages



Difference Equations
Purpose: To apply linear algebra concepts to study the properties of sequences defined by difference equations. Prerequisites: The concepts of linear ...
www.math.duke.edu/education/ccp/materials/linalg/diffeqs/index.html - 5k - Cached - Similar pages

0
 
Beta07Author Commented:
Interesting. The next question is:

x(n+1) - 4x(n) + 3x(n-1) = 3^n

Which I'm having the same problem with (getting 0 coefficients).

Would the particular solution take the form:

a*3^n + c*n^3 + d*n^2 + e*n + f

?
0
Cloud Class® Course: CompTIA Healthcare IT Tech

This course will help prep you to earn the CompTIA Healthcare IT Technician certification showing that you have the knowledge and skills needed to succeed in installing, managing, and troubleshooting IT systems in medical and clinical settings.

 
Beta07Author Commented:
> a*b^n + c*n^3 + d*n^2 + e*n + f

Isn't that the form of the general solution?
And is there a reason for having a cubic rather than a quadratic? ("Because it works" will suffice)
0
 
ozoCommented:
x(n+1) - x(n)  = 36n^2 would be cubic
x(n+1) - 4x(n) = 0 would be exponential
0
 
Beta07Author Commented:
Ahhh, very clever!

I'll give it a shot, thanks
0
 
Beta07Author Commented:
Hmm, when I plug

x(n) = a*b^n + c*n^3 + d*n^2 + e*n + f

into

x(n+1) - 4x(n) + 3x(n-1) = 36n^2

And equate coefficients, the only information I get out of it is:

d = 3c
c+d+e = 0

:-\
0
 
Beta07Author Commented:
I think I may have figured it (this method has worked for 3^n instead of 36n²), I'm just stuck on this one step;

The Shift Operator, E, is defined as:  E x(n) = x(n+1)
So obviously, E^k x(n) = x(n+k)

I need to define an annihilator A(E), such that:

A(E) n^2 = 0

An example for n is:

(E-1)^2 n = 0
0
 
Beta07Author Commented:
Oh, lol

(E-1)^4  n^2 = 0

:-)

Which makes sense from more than one perspective ..
0
 
Beta07Author Commented:
Ah, done it! :)

I used a slightly varied method to my previous attempts (obviously), but it practically paralleled ozo's solution; and in doing so, I realised where I went wrong with my first attempt with ozo's suggestion..

Thanks
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.