Solved

Which versions of Windows Server 2003 come with Exchange Server 2003?

Posted on 2007-11-21
11
216 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-18
I have an office with just under 50 users in it and I would like to setup a Windows 2003 Server with Exchange Server 2003.  Which version of Windows Server 2003 should I buy and which versions come with Exchange Server included?  Some background is this network is at a single location and that there are no windows servers there as of yet.  This server will be the first and probably the only Windows domain controller / e-mai server in this office.  
0
Comment
Question by:Gary Gordon
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • +1
11 Comments
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
notfuzzi earned 300 total points
ID: 20329874
Small Business Server sounds like it would be perfect for your needs.  There are some limitations, but it comes with Sharepoint, Exchange, and is fairly easy to administer.  You can read about it at:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/default.mspx
0
 
LVL 3

Assisted Solution

by:trturner123
trturner123 earned 100 total points
ID: 20329904
Small Business server is the only version of Windows 2003 that comes with Exchange 2003 included.  Every other version, Exchange is a seperate product/installation.
0
 
LVL 4

Author Comment

by:Gary Gordon
ID: 20330056
Thanks NF.  
What are my options if I don't wan't to use Small Business Server?
Does Exchange Server 2003 come with Windows Server 2003?
0
Does Powershell have you tied up in knots?

Managing Active Directory does not always have to be complicated.  If you are spending more time trying instead of doing, then it's time to look at something else. For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why

 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:notfuzzi
ID: 20330084
Nah, as trturner said, it's Small Business Server or purchase Exchange separately... but you can't beat the price of SBS.
0
 
LVL 4

Author Comment

by:Gary Gordon
ID: 20330107
t123... You may have posted while I was typing.
Thanks for the input
0
 
LVL 4

Author Comment

by:Gary Gordon
ID: 20330119
What are the pitfalls of using Windows 2003 SBS?  

Basically I can not add aditional servers to the domain correct?
0
 
LVL 58

Assisted Solution

by:tigermatt
tigermatt earned 100 total points
ID: 20330175
Hi ggordon777,

As mentioned above the only version of Windows Server 2003 which has Exchange included is the Small Business Version. If you opt for the Standard version, you have to purchase Exchange separately, which includes a separate license and separate client access licenses (CALs).

If you opt for an SBS server, you can add additional member servers to the domain and even make them domain controllers, in your current office or at a remote location if necessary in the future. However, the SBS *must* hold all the FSMO roles and be at the root of the domain & forest, and you cannot install SBS on another server in the same domain, you must install Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition (there can only be 1 SBS in a domain too). You cannot set up trusts between other domains if you have an SBS domain and an SBS is restricted to a maximum of 75 users. However, although the CALs are a little more expensive (when purchasing SBS CALs be sure they are in fact SBS CALs as they are different to standard CALs), they do include the licenses for Exchange and SQL server which comes with SBS 2003 as standard.

SBS is really a tightly integrated server solution, which comes with Exchange and SQL server. It is generally much cheaper than 2003 Standard, but if you can foresee going over 75 users in the near future or getting such a large network that you will need to expand Exchange or SQL server, then I would go for standard edition. You *can* buy a transition pack in the future if you had to migrate out of the SBS to a Windows 2003 standard domain, so if you can't see any of the downsides of SBS compared with a standard domain affecting you imminently, I can't see any problem with going for an SBS. An SBS also has excellent wizards to set every aspect of the server up, so if this is your first server install it should be pain-free. A 2003 standard domain with Exchange would need everything done manually which, although it can be done, ideally requires experience.

-tigermatt
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:notfuzzi
ID: 20330177
You can add a server as a member server, but not a domain controller.  Also you can only have 75 users total.
0
 
LVL 58

Expert Comment

by:tigermatt
ID: 20330223
>>> You can add a server as a member server, but not a domain controller.
This is completely untrue. You can certainly add additional member servers *and* domain controllers to an SBS domain. However, you cannot have more than one SBS server in the same SBS domain, and the SBS must hold all the FSMO roles and be at the root of the domain and forest. Provided you satisfy this and never change things around, you can add additional Windows Server 2003 Standard edition domain controllers. This is how remote offices in an SBS setup often work, a replica DC & GC at a remote site is much quicker in any environment, SBS or not; if Microsoft restricted you to not having additional DCs on an SBS, there would be very few businesses out there using the product.

This web link confirms all: http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/archive/2007/10/04/debunking-the-myth-about-additional-domain-controllers-replica-dcs-in-an-sbs-domain.aspx

-tigermatt
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:notfuzzi
ID: 20330261
Haha, sorry I know that wasn't an exactly true statement, but I was trying to keep it simple since ggordon listed himself as a beginner in the subject, and said he didn't have any remote sites to worry about.  What I usually try to say is that for the most part, you want to make your other servers as member servers unless you are a little more experienced with server administration.  But Tigermatt is 100% correct and gave some great information.
0
 
LVL 4

Author Comment

by:Gary Gordon
ID: 20330345
Thank you all for the timely help!  
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Find out what you should include to make the best professional email signature for your organization.
In-place Upgrading Dirsync to Azure AD Connect
To show how to generate a certificate request in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.:  First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Servers >> Certificates…
To add imagery to an HTML email signature, you have two options available to you. You can either add a logo/image by embedding it directly into the signature or hosting it externally and linking to it. The vast majority of email clients display l…

734 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question