Solved

64-bit power of 2 calculation

Posted on 2007-11-25
6
1,063 Views
Last Modified: 2012-08-13
I found online a nice algorithm for calculating the next highest power of 2.  However, the algorithm takes a 32-bit integer.  It seems to work just as well on 64-bit integers, but I'm not sure if it's guaranteed to always work.  Will the following algorithm always return a 64-bit integer that is the next greatest power of 2?

uint64_t nextp2(uint64_t n)
{
      --n;
       n |= n >> 16;
       n |= n >> 8;
       n |= n >> 4;
       n |= n >> 2;
       n |= n >> 1;
       ++n;
       return n;
}
0
Comment
Question by:chsalvia
6 Comments
 
LVL 55

Expert Comment

by:Jaime Olivares
ID: 20347861
the order is important, it should be:

n--;
n |= n >> 1;
n |= n >> 2;
n |= n >> 4;
n |= n >> 8;
n |= n >> 16;
n |= n >> 32;
n++;
0
 

Author Comment

by:chsalvia
ID: 20347886
That doesn't seem to work.

For example, that yields 0 for the value 100
0
 
LVL 55

Accepted Solution

by:
Jaime Olivares earned 125 total points
ID: 20347942
Using my calculator:

n--;    // gives 99
n |= n >> 1;   // gives 115
n |= n >> 2;   // gives 127
n |= n >> 4;   // gives 127  
n |= n >> 8;   // gives 127
n |= n >> 16;   // gives 127
n |= n >> 32;   // gives 127
n++;  // gives 128

so, it works perfectly with 100


0
ScreenConnect 6.0 Free Trial

Want empowering updates? You're in the right place! Discover new features in ScreenConnect 6.0, based on partner feedback, to keep you business operating smoothly and optimally (the way it should be). Explore all of the extras and enhancements for yourself!

 

Author Comment

by:chsalvia
ID: 20347974
You're right.  I was screwing up the return value.  Thanks.
0
 
LVL 84

Expert Comment

by:ozo
ID: 20348480
The order is not important
       n |= n >> 16;
       n |= n >> 8;
       n |= n >> 4;
       n |= n >> 2;
       n |= n >> 1;
       n |= n >> 32;
works just as well
but if the number is already a power of two, you get the same number back, not the "next" power of two
0
 
LVL 53

Expert Comment

by:Infinity08
ID: 20349257
>> The order is not important

Indeed. You just needed to add :

       n |= n >> 32;

to make it 64bit integer compatible.
0

Featured Post

Efficient way to get backups off site to Azure

This user guide provides instructions on how to deploy and configure both a StoneFly Scale Out NAS Enterprise Cloud Drive virtual machine and Veeam Cloud Connect in the Microsoft Azure Cloud.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This tutorial is posted by Aaron Wojnowski, administrator at SDKExpert.net.  To view more iPhone tutorials, visit www.sdkexpert.net. This is a very simple tutorial on finding the user's current location easily. In this tutorial, you will learn ho…
This is a short and sweet, but (hopefully) to the point article. There seems to be some fundamental misunderstanding about the function prototype for the "main" function in C and C++, more specifically what type this function should return. I see so…
The goal of this video is to provide viewers with basic examples to understand and use pointers in the C programming language.
The goal of this video is to provide viewers with basic examples to understand and use structures in the C programming language.

867 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

20 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now