Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people, just like you, are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
Solved

64-bit power of 2 calculation

Posted on 2007-11-25
6
1,070 Views
Last Modified: 2012-08-13
I found online a nice algorithm for calculating the next highest power of 2.  However, the algorithm takes a 32-bit integer.  It seems to work just as well on 64-bit integers, but I'm not sure if it's guaranteed to always work.  Will the following algorithm always return a 64-bit integer that is the next greatest power of 2?

uint64_t nextp2(uint64_t n)
{
      --n;
       n |= n >> 16;
       n |= n >> 8;
       n |= n >> 4;
       n |= n >> 2;
       n |= n >> 1;
       ++n;
       return n;
}
0
Comment
Question by:chsalvia
6 Comments
 
LVL 55

Expert Comment

by:Jaime Olivares
ID: 20347861
the order is important, it should be:

n--;
n |= n >> 1;
n |= n >> 2;
n |= n >> 4;
n |= n >> 8;
n |= n >> 16;
n |= n >> 32;
n++;
0
 

Author Comment

by:chsalvia
ID: 20347886
That doesn't seem to work.

For example, that yields 0 for the value 100
0
 
LVL 55

Accepted Solution

by:
Jaime Olivares earned 125 total points
ID: 20347942
Using my calculator:

n--;    // gives 99
n |= n >> 1;   // gives 115
n |= n >> 2;   // gives 127
n |= n >> 4;   // gives 127  
n |= n >> 8;   // gives 127
n |= n >> 16;   // gives 127
n |= n >> 32;   // gives 127
n++;  // gives 128

so, it works perfectly with 100


0
Optimizing Cloud Backup for Low Bandwidth

With cloud storage prices going down a growing number of SMBs start to use it for backup storage. Unfortunately, business data volume rarely fits the average Internet speed. This article provides an overview of main Internet speed challenges and reveals backup best practices.

 

Author Comment

by:chsalvia
ID: 20347974
You're right.  I was screwing up the return value.  Thanks.
0
 
LVL 84

Expert Comment

by:ozo
ID: 20348480
The order is not important
       n |= n >> 16;
       n |= n >> 8;
       n |= n >> 4;
       n |= n >> 2;
       n |= n >> 1;
       n |= n >> 32;
works just as well
but if the number is already a power of two, you get the same number back, not the "next" power of two
0
 
LVL 53

Expert Comment

by:Infinity08
ID: 20349257
>> The order is not important

Indeed. You just needed to add :

       n |= n >> 32;

to make it 64bit integer compatible.
0

Featured Post

ScreenConnect 6.0 Free Trial

Discover new time-saving features in one game-changing release, ScreenConnect 6.0, based on partner feedback. New features include a redesigned UI, app configurations and chat acknowledgement to improve customer engagement!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Have you thought about creating an iPhone application (app), but didn't even know where to get started? Here's how: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Important pre-programming comments: I’ve never tri…
Preface I don't like visual development tools that are supposed to write a program for me. Even if it is Xcode and I can use Interface Builder. Yes, it is a perfect tool and has helped me a lot, mainly, in the beginning, when my programs were small…
The goal of this video is to provide viewers with basic examples to understand how to use strings and some functions related to them in the C programming language.
The goal of this video is to provide viewers with basic examples to understand opening and reading files in the C programming language.

860 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question