How do I release a pointer to a sturcture in C++?

Posted on 2007-11-26
Last Modified: 2008-02-01
I declare a pointer to a sturcture as follow:
IDispatch *pDisp=NULL;
At the clean up section of my code, how can I safely release this pointer?  My current code is getting me a error message of "Freeing freed memory"

Thank you.

Question by:lapucca
LVL 30

Accepted Solution

Axter earned 300 total points
ID: 20353499
You should nullify your pointer after calling release.

    pDisp = NULL;

Open in new window


Author Comment

ID: 20353561
Really?  Do I have to do that for all pointer to anything or just structure?  I have to go over my code and correct all of them if so.  Let me try this and let you know if that would take care of my error.  Thank you.
LVL 86

Expert Comment

ID: 20353587
Actually, that should be


Without the brackets, the statement is meaningless.
Master Your Team's Linux and Cloud Stack

Come see why top tech companies like Mailchimp and Media Temple use Linux Academy to build their employee training programs.

LVL 53

Expert Comment

ID: 20353715
>> Do I have to do that for all pointer to anything or just structure?

Yes, otherwise, this check won't catch that the pointer has already been released :

LVL 28

Assisted Solution

pepr earned 200 total points
ID: 20356490
Technically, the pointer variable stores the addres of the memory space where the pointed thing is located. The NULL is a special constant that (technically zero) that says "pointing to nowhere".

In your case, you are pointint to the COM Dispatch interface, which is an object that represents the interface of some COM object to be accessed usually from an interpreted language.

If the pDisp were set to NULL, the pDisp is interpreted as false in a boolean context (the if condition). Otherwise, it is interpreted as true in the boolean context. In the body of the if control structure, you are calling the method of the pointed object (i.e. pDisp->Release();)  If the object exists, then it is fine. If the object does not exist, then it is an error.

Actually, you do not need to assign NULL to a pointer after deleting the pointed object if you are sure that the pointer is never to be used any more. However, you never know who and how the source code will be modified later. The rule of thumb is to always assign NULL to pointers that should be invalidated.
LVL 86

Expert Comment

ID: 20358729
Funny, so that worked using



Wow, C++ never stops surprising me...

Featured Post

Master Your Team's Linux and Cloud Stack!

The average business loses $13.5M per year to ineffective training (per 1,000 employees). Keep ahead of the competition and combine in-person quality with online cost and flexibility by training with Linux Academy.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

When writing generic code, using template meta-programming techniques, it is sometimes useful to know if a type is convertible to another type. A good example of when this might be is if you are writing diagnostic instrumentation for code to generat…
Often, when implementing a feature, you won't know how certain events should be handled at the point where they occur and you'd rather defer to the user of your function or class. For example, a XML parser will extract a tag from the source code, wh…
The viewer will learn how to pass data into a function in C++. This is one step further in using functions. Instead of only printing text onto the console, the function will be able to perform calculations with argumentents given by the user.
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.

773 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question