Solved

performance of SAS vs SATA

Posted on 2007-11-26
3
6,984 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
i'm need to determine what the performance characteritics are of SAS and SATA drives. SATA drives ar cheaper. Why buy SAS?
0
Comment
Question by:JColburn
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 25

Accepted Solution

by:
kode99 earned 125 total points
ID: 20354539
SAS drives are available in much higher end performance than SATA.  So the difference will vary depending on the drive we are talking about.

For example you can get Seagate Barracuda drives is SATA and SAS.  Performance is similar with either interface as it is the same drive hardware - both drives are 7,200 RPM drives.

But if you look at the Cheeta line you now can choose SCSI, SAS or fibre channel and are talking about drives with spindle speeds up to 15,000 RPM.  These drives will give significantly better performance than SATA drives - or the 7,200 RPM SAS units for that matter.  The Cheeta drive does actually have throughput figures that are almost double that of most typical SATA drives.

To get an idea take a look at the performance charts over at Storage Review,  not all drives are listed with all interfaces but you can get an idea of how the trends go.

http://www.storagereview.com/php/benchmark/bench_sort.php

It is also worth noting that SAS drives, like SCSI are designed for 24/7 operation and sport longer MTBF periods than typical SATA drives.  Drives like the WD Raptor and a number of the 'enterprise' SATA drives are also designed for longer life than many consumer drives.

Of course the one 'weak' spot with these higher performance drives is price per GB,  which is much higher than SATA drives.

One nice thing about SAS controllers is they can support both SAS and SATA drives.  So you have the option to use both performance drives or cheaper SATA drives.

Why by SAS drives?  I think it really would depend on the needs.   A front line SQL server may simply need an array of 15,000 RPM drives to fill the bill.  At the same time a small company might need several TB of file space for online archives and SATA would make that very affordable.

0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:Computer101
ID: 20943505
Forced accept.

Computer101
Community Support Moderator
0

Featured Post

Ransomware: The New Cyber Threat & How to Stop It

This infographic explains ransomware, type of malware that blocks access to your files or your systems and holds them hostage until a ransom is paid. It also examines the different types of ransomware and explains what you can do to thwart this sinister online threat.  

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Many people find themselves in a situation while using PC's that they suspect or find out they have a hard disk problem. The big question then is what to do about it; how to handle the problem, and in which order.  This article is intended to help p…
As hardware bugs go, this is a strange one! I upgraded a laptop in December 2011 with a 512GB Crucial m4 2.5-inch/9.5mm SATA Solid State Drive (SSD), Crucial part number CT512M4SSD2: http://www.crucial.com/store/partspecs.aspx?IMODULE=CT512M4SSD2 …
This video Micro Tutorial explains how to clone a hard drive using a commercial software product for Windows systems called Casper from Future Systems Solutions (FSS). Cloning makes an exact, complete copy of one hard disk drive (HDD) onto another d…
This is my first video review of Microsoft Bookings, I will be doing a part two with a bit more information, but wanted to get this out to you folks.
Suggested Courses

617 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question