• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 2023
  • Last Modified:

.EDB vs .STM Database sizes

We have recently made a tremendous effort to reduce file space on our server by requiring each user to clean up his or her email in hopes that it will reduce the exchange database sizes.
Although each several users have decreased their mailbox size by several gig total, the .EDB and .STM don't seem to have really decreased in size.
I have also noticed that the .STM database (22.5 Gb) is nearly as large as the .EDB database (25.3 Gb). From what I have seen on several other Exchange Servers, the .STM less than half the size of the .EDB.
Can anyone explain the difference of the databases and how to manage the sizes better?
2 Solutions
You need to do an offline defrad to revover the space. If you delete data in the database files, they dont shrink, just have "white space" ready to be filled with new data. do do an offline defrag use the ESEUTIL command within the exchange\bin dir.


the STM files and EDB files are usualy about the same have a look at:


The sizes of the files will never decrease without an offline defrag. An offline defrag is total downtime and unless you are going to gain 40% of the space back, it isn't worth the downtime for most sites.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Free Tool: IP Lookup

Get more info about an IP address or domain name, such as organization, abuse contacts and geolocation.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now