• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1504
  • Last Modified:

Capacitor, with half a dielectric

A parallel plate capacitor has a capacitance C when there is vacuum between the plates. How does
this change if the gap between the plates is half filled with a dielectric with dielectric constant eps_r?

(The given diagram looks almost as good as this ;)

                                             |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             +--------------------------------+
                                             |             Dielectric              |
                                             +--------------------------------+
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            |


Here's my idea:

Treat the capacitor as two seperate capacitors, in parallel, like so:

                             |
             +-----------+----------+
             |                              |
---------------------      -------------------
                                     Dielectric
---------------------      -------------------
             |                             |
            +-----------+----------+
                            |

Then through a bit of math, this gets me to:

C = C0*(1+eps_r)/2

I notice that the (1+eps_r)/2 term is the average eps_r value (as eps_r=1 in vacuum); so it would make sense.

However, [as my last question proved], it's better safe than sorry...
So is this the correct method?

(I have a quick follow up question after this)


Thanks
0
InteractiveMind
Asked:
InteractiveMind
  • 3
  • 2
1 Solution
 
d-glitchCommented:
That is correct.
The conducting plates are equipotential surfaces, so you can break them up that way.
0
 
d-glitchCommented:
C_left  +  C_right  =  eps_0 *( A/2)/d  +  eps_r * (A/2)/d  =  (eps_0 + eps_r)*(A/2)/d
0
 
InteractiveMindAuthor Commented:
Oh, I thought it was:

C_left  +  C_right  =  eps_0 *( A/2)/d  +  eps_r * eps_0 * (A/2)/d  =  eps_0*(1 + eps_r)*(A/2)/d

?
0
 
d-glitchCommented:
You arecorrect if you are dealing with relative permitivities.
0
 
InteractiveMindAuthor Commented:
Okay, cool.

(Don't worry about the follow up question; I've figured it)

Thank you, d-glitch.
0

Featured Post

Upgrade your Question Security!

Add Premium security features to your question to ensure its privacy or anonymity. Learn more about your ability to control Question Security today.

  • 3
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now