Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

An alternate solution for this bad loop

Posted on 2007-12-04
8
Medium Priority
?
248 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-01
I finally got this loop to change but I can't fiqure out another way to stop

while (x = 1)

   {

            cout << "x is: " << x << '\n';

   }


The above code executes a never ending loop displaying x is: 1 out to the console.

This happens because condition x = 1 is reset to 1 (never changes) every time the loop is performed,  even if the  x++  increment is added.

One way to stop this loop is as follows&.

    int x = 1;      // initialize interger x to equal 1

    while (x < 2) // execute loop while x is less than 2

    {    
            cout << "x is: " << x << '\n';      // console out x is: 1

            x++;   // increment x by 1 (this will change the loop condition and terminate the loop

    }

I need an alternate way to stop this loop.  Can you help me?
0
Comment
Question by:cooperk50
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
8 Comments
 
LVL 46

Accepted Solution

by:
Kent Olsen earned 252 total points
ID: 20402417
Hi cooperk50,

You must have missed the answer in the other thread.

  while (x == 1)

That will enter the loop if x is 1, and keep looping until x has any other value.

If you want to execute the loop once, no matter what the value of x, do this:

  do
  {
    cout << "x is:  " << x << \n";
    ++x;
  } while (x == 1);


Good Luck,
Kent
0
 
LVL 53

Expert Comment

by:Infinity08
ID: 20402421
>> I need an alternate way to stop this loop.  Can you help me?

What do you mean by alternate ?

What do you want the code to do ?
0
 
LVL 39

Assisted Solution

by:itsmeandnobodyelse
itsmeandnobodyelse earned 248 total points
ID: 20402625
>>>> I need an alternate way to stop this loop.

You could do:

  int x = 0;
  while (true)
  {
        cout << "x = " << x << endl;
        cin >> x;
        if (x <= 0)
              break;
  }

Note, the break statement would exit the current loop. In case of a nested loop (loop in loop) you need a break for each of the loops. Another statement for a loop is the 'continue' statement. It will 'go to' end of loop but not breaking it. So, if you want to exit the loop you should break. Or you set the end condition and call continue.

  int x = 0;
  bool goon = true;
  while (goon)
  {
       cout << " x = " << x << endl;
       cout << "Do you want to go on? [Y/N] ";
       char c;
       cin >> c;
       if (c == 'N' || c == 'n')
       {
             goon = false;
             continue;
       }  
       x = rand();  // get any randomized number
  }

Shorter is the following (not using continue)

  int x = 0;
  bool goon = true;
  while (goon)
  {
       cout << " x = " << x << endl;
       cout << "Do you want to go on? [Y/N] ";
       char c;
       cin >> c;
       goon = !(c == 'N' || c == 'n');
       x = rand();  // get any randomized number
  }

However, the difference is that x was set to a new random number if not calling continue or break.

Regards, Alex



0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
LVL 39

Expert Comment

by:itsmeandnobodyelse
ID: 25398644
Whatever the wished answer was. Kdo didn't post an 'alternate' answer to that the asker posted.

I would recommend to delete the q. without refund.
0
 
LVL 46

Expert Comment

by:Kent Olsen
ID: 25398977
When tied to a similar question in another thread, my answer would seem to be sufficient.  The poster first asked this:

  http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/CPP/Q_22999993.html

He then repeated his error in this thread.


Kent
0
 
LVL 39

Expert Comment

by:itsmeandnobodyelse
ID: 25400199
>>>> When tied to a similar question in another thread, my answer would seem to be sufficient.  

You are right, Kent.

Sorry for misinterpreting your answer here in that thread.
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In days of old, returning something by value from a function in C++ was necessarily avoided because it would, invariably, involve one or even two copies of the object being created and potentially costly calls to a copy-constructor and destructor. A…
Introduction This article is the first in a series of articles about the C/C++ Visual Studio Express debugger.  It provides a quick start guide in using the debugger. Part 2 focuses on additional topics in breakpoints.  Lastly, Part 3 focuses on th…
The viewer will learn how to use the return statement in functions in C++. The video will also teach the user how to pass data to a function and have the function return data back for further processing.
The viewer will learn additional member functions of the vector class. Specifically, the capacity and swap member functions will be introduced.
Suggested Courses

688 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question