• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1652
  • Last Modified:

NFS mount and cpanel backup

Hello,

We want to implement NFS mount and do backups via NFS mount in cpanel servers. We want to know
whether there is any risks in doing this. Is it stable?

Can we use NFS for backing up cpanel servers ?

We want to know whether is there any advantages or disadvantages of using NFS
to have cPanel backup. Will it cause the server to crash?

Any help will be appreciated.... Thanks in advance ....

--
Regards,
Anusha
0
crucialtest
Asked:
crucialtest
  • 2
1 Solution
 
yhettiCommented:
You want to mount the cpanel site tree via NFS on a third server and copy it over?  As in,

ServerA = Hosting server
ServerB = Backup

serverb> mount -t nfs servera:/home/sites/ /mnt/nfs/sites
serverb> tar -cvzf /backups /mnt/nfs/sites

?  Is that correct?

It should work with no difficulty/side effects, though honestly I'd suggest rsyncd instead.  Less overhead and it will only copy changes.  Very easy to set up, also.

0
 
crucialtestAuthor Commented:
Hello,

Thanks for the updates.
We want to use NFS mount and backup system in our new servers with cpanel. The thing i want to know is about any disadvantage in using NFS????

WE have heard a few mixed comments about this, saying thats its not stable and it is risky.

--
Regards,
Anusha
0
 
yhettiCommented:
There's always a certain amount of risk, but you can mitigate it pretty easily.

1) make sure squash_root is enabled (I believe it's by default, but do it explicitly)
2) Use NFS over TCP and firewall that port for everything except the backup server
3) Use NFS3 or 4 over older versions.  NFS4 should be on any new distros
4) Export the mount point as read only (ro)

The disadvantage to using NFS over something designed for backups (such as rsync):
- NFS tends to be slower
- Depending on the config, if the network is sluggish or there are problems with one of the machines, both of them could slow down (the client machine could lock up completely if you try to access an NFS share that's unavailable)
- Every backup will copy the entire directory tree, not just changes.
- There *could* be some problems with simultaneous access, but it's unlikely.
- portmap and RPC are traditionally greater security risks than rsync or even scp -R; that's not to say they *are* bigger risks, just that in the past they have been.
- THe users in /etc/passwd have to match, or you have to use ugidd, OR turn on no_root_squash, in order to get to all the files (you access NFS via minimum security, as opposed to rsync, which you can run as root only as needed.)

0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Cloud Class® Course: Microsoft Office 2010

This course will introduce you to the interfaces and features of Microsoft Office 2010 Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Access. You will learn about the features that are shared between all products in the Office suite, as well as the new features that are product specific.

  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now