?
Solved

ESX Use v's Physical

Posted on 2007-12-05
3
Medium Priority
?
397 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-21
Hi,

A critical application requires a fault tolernat solution. The application is quite resource intensive.
2 options:
1. Look at conventional clustering on physical boxes (SAN Backend)
2. Use ESX Enterprise (will be using ESX for less resource intensive boxes) (SAN Backend)

The question is, from a fault tolerant standpoint, what beneits or disadvantages does ESX provide in this circumstance from conventional routes.
0
Comment
Question by:58872
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:cuziyq
ID: 20415868
This is just my opinion, but people do all kinds of crazy things that I disagree with but actually wind up working quite well.  But anyway . . .

ESX should be thought of as a server consolidation solution and not much more.  If a particular application is absolutely critical to operations, or demands bleeding edge performance, it really really should be on its own server.  If the app is on a dedicated server, then ESX is redundant in that scenario.

Here's something else to think about too.  ESX is a bare metal solution, but if you don't want to waste an entire box on a program that might not be doing much, consider plain old VMWare Server.  The critical app runs natively on the host OS, while you can still recoup some idle server resources to run in VM's on that box.  Kind of a combo solution.
0
 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
robocat earned 2000 total points
ID: 20416063

Clustering adds complexity to your setup and can be difficult to manage.

Using ESX as a High Availability solution is less complex and easier to setup and manage, but it does take away some performance. There are also limits on scalability (4 virtual processors for one VM, 16GB RAM).

It also depends if the app is cluster aware. If not, a cluster will probably do no better than ESX HA from a pure fault tolerant standpoint, as both need to failover with interruption.

As you will be using ESX for less resource intensive apps anyway, why don't you try your app on ESX and see how performance works out.

0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:58872
ID: 31412990
Thanks.
0

Featured Post

What is SQL Server and how does it work?

The purpose of this paper is to provide you background on SQL Server. It’s your self-study guide for learning fundamentals. It includes both the history of SQL and its technical basics. Concepts and definitions will form the solid foundation of your future DBA expertise.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In this article, I will show you HOW TO: Suppress Configuration Issues and Warnings Alert displayed in Summary status for ESXi 6.5 after enabling SSH or ESXi Shell.
When rebooting a vCenters 6.0 and try to connect using vSphere Client we get this issue "Invalid URL: The hostname could not parsed." When we get this error we need to do some changes in the vCenter advanced settings to fix the issue.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to enable the VMware\Hyper-V licensed feature of Backup Exec 2012. In addition, how to add a VMware server and configure a backup job. The first step is to acquire the necessary licen…
How to Install VMware Tools in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4 (RHEL 6.4) Step-by-Step Tutorial
Suggested Courses

801 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question