Solved

ESX Use v's Physical

Posted on 2007-12-05
3
384 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-21
Hi,

A critical application requires a fault tolernat solution. The application is quite resource intensive.
2 options:
1. Look at conventional clustering on physical boxes (SAN Backend)
2. Use ESX Enterprise (will be using ESX for less resource intensive boxes) (SAN Backend)

The question is, from a fault tolerant standpoint, what beneits or disadvantages does ESX provide in this circumstance from conventional routes.
0
Comment
Question by:58872
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:cuziyq
ID: 20415868
This is just my opinion, but people do all kinds of crazy things that I disagree with but actually wind up working quite well.  But anyway . . .

ESX should be thought of as a server consolidation solution and not much more.  If a particular application is absolutely critical to operations, or demands bleeding edge performance, it really really should be on its own server.  If the app is on a dedicated server, then ESX is redundant in that scenario.

Here's something else to think about too.  ESX is a bare metal solution, but if you don't want to waste an entire box on a program that might not be doing much, consider plain old VMWare Server.  The critical app runs natively on the host OS, while you can still recoup some idle server resources to run in VM's on that box.  Kind of a combo solution.
0
 
LVL 21

Accepted Solution

by:
robocat earned 500 total points
ID: 20416063

Clustering adds complexity to your setup and can be difficult to manage.

Using ESX as a High Availability solution is less complex and easier to setup and manage, but it does take away some performance. There are also limits on scalability (4 virtual processors for one VM, 16GB RAM).

It also depends if the app is cluster aware. If not, a cluster will probably do no better than ESX HA from a pure fault tolerant standpoint, as both need to failover with interruption.

As you will be using ESX for less resource intensive apps anyway, why don't you try your app on ESX and see how performance works out.

0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:58872
ID: 31412990
Thanks.
0

Featured Post

NFR key for Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365

Veeam is happy to provide a free NFR license (for 1 year, up to 10 users). This license allows for the non‑production use of Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 in your home lab without any feature limitations.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Restore VM Creates MAC Conflict. 6 91
Win Server 2016 licensing for vmware vsphere HA 7 81
patch update 11 61
Moving vSAN traffic to a new network 4 72
HOW TO: Install and Configure VMware vSphere Hypervisor 6.5 (ESXi 6.5), Step by Step Tutorial with screenshots. From Download, Checking Media, to Completed Installation.
HOW TO: Connect to the VMware vSphere Hypervisor 6.5 (ESXi 6.5) using the vSphere (HTML5 Web) Host Client 6.5, and perform a simple configuration task of adding a new VMFS 6 datastore.
This Micro Tutorial walks you through using a remote console to access a server and install ESXi 5.1. This example is showing remote access and installation using a Dell server. The hypervisor is the very first component of your virtual infrastructu…
This video shows you how easy it is to boot from ISO images for virtual machines with the ISO images stored on a local datastore on the ESXi host.

726 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question