Solved

ORACLE.UTL_FILE problem

Posted on 2007-12-06
7
821 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-19
Hi, I'm facing a strange problem using UTL_FILE Oracle package.
I have a PL/SQL procedure that has to performe a simple query and write the result in a file.
Now, in my enviroment, if I execute the procedure, I wrote a single file with 300.000 records, no problem.
In another enviroment, the procedure has this behaviour:
- it writes the file header;
- it writes an amount of data equals to total_record_number%10.000; as example: if total_record_number = 79.234, the number of record written in the file is 9.234.
I think that it must be a configuration parameter that is set in order to limit max row number in a file, o smt like this...
Any clues?
0
Comment
Question by:hanoirules
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
7 Comments
 
LVL 27

Assisted Solution

by:sujith80
sujith80 earned 100 total points
ID: 20418956
Well the problem must be with your code.
Are you opening the file every time in a loop?

The file must be closed at the end also. Make sure that your code takes the following form

.
open file;
loop
 write to file;
end loop;
close file;
.
0
 

Author Comment

by:hanoirules
ID: 20419087
Excuse me, how can it be that the problem is in my procedure, if in my enviroment everithing works fine?
I can write a file with 300.000 records; in the other enviroment the problem that I described is on 79.000 records.. am I missing smt?
Anyway, the operations you listed are those I perfome..
0
 
LVL 48

Accepted Solution

by:
schwertner earned 150 total points
ID: 20419297
You have to add to your procedure an EXCEPTION section that will show you
what happens:

BEGIN
    dbms_output.enable(100000);
.....
  EXCEPTION
  WHEN OTHERS THEN
     dbms_output.put_line('Errors  encountered.');
     dbms_output.put_line(substr(sqlerrm,1,254));
END;
0
Salesforce Has Never Been Easier

Improve and reinforce salesforce training & adoption using WalkMe's digital adoption platform. Start saving on costly employee training by creating fast intuitive Walk-Thrus for Salesforce. Claim your Free Account Now

 

Author Comment

by:hanoirules
ID: 20419389
I already did it.
No exceptions are thrown (and they are correctly catched).
Not to be annoying, but the procedure works.
The problem is to identify if there is a parameter that manages max row number for file, or if it is possible that, if there is not enought space on the disk, Oracle manages files in such a way.
Thanks for your help
0
 
LVL 2

Assisted Solution

by:ysd
ysd earned 150 total points
ID: 20419515
I had similar situation some time ago, where in one machine was working without any problems and on another it was encountering a problem.....A fter I trapped the error with an exception handler, I saw that I was getting buffer ran out, or something like that.  What I did was that every 5000 records I was calling the FFLUSH procedure which is physically writting the data to the file and it clears the buffer, then you continue writting until you finish. Just include this in the loop for a small number of recs first just to see if it solves your problem, and then you can increase the number of recs before you fllush in order to be more efficient.  

I hope it helps
0
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:ysd
ID: 20419516
I had similar situation some time ago, where in one machine was working without any problems and on another it was encountering a problem.....A fter I trapped the error with an exception handler, I saw that I was getting buffer ran out, or something like that.  What I did was that every 5000 records I was calling the FFLUSH procedure which is physically writting the data to the file and it clears the buffer, then you continue writting until you finish. Just include this in the loop for a small number of recs first just to see if it solves your problem, and then you can increase the number of recs before you fllush in order to be more efficient.  

I hope it helps
0
 
LVL 35

Assisted Solution

by:Mark Geerlings
Mark Geerlings earned 100 total points
ID: 20420637
If the FFLUSH command doesn't help, can you give us some more information, like:
1. Are both databases the same version of Oracle?  Which version(s)?
2. Are both servers on the same O/S?  Which O/S(es)?
3. Are the disk systems the same (local SCSI, or SAN or NAS, etc.)?
4. Do you use physical directories for UTL_FILE or logical directories?  Are they the same in both systems?
0

Featured Post

Enroll in July's Course of the Month

July's Course of the Month is now available! Enroll to learn HTML5 and prepare for certification. It's free for Premium Members, Team Accounts, and Qualified Experts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article started out as an Experts-Exchange question, which then grew into a quick tip to go along with an IOUG presentation for the Collaborate confernce and then later grew again into a full blown article with expanded functionality and legacy…
Shell script to create broker configuration file using current broker Configuration, solely for purpose of backup on Linux. Script may need to be modified depending on OS-installation. Please deploy and verify the script in a test environment.
This video shows syntax for various backup options while discussing how the different basic backup types work.  It explains how to take full backups, incremental level 0 backups, incremental level 1 backups in both differential and cumulative mode a…
This videos aims to give the viewer a basic demonstration of how a user can query current session information by using the SYS_CONTEXT function
Suggested Courses

623 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question