[Last Call] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
?
Solved

sata 3.0Gbps in new server

Posted on 2007-12-06
6
Medium Priority
?
176 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-03
I am looking at buying a new server that will be used as a file & storage server. it will have programs that user need, others would store large files. all my other servers have scsi 10,000 drive. would the sata drives be to slow for a file server. when my apps lab needs to pull down 1 or 2 gig files when a customers is here we dont want any slow downs, all computers in the lab have 10000 rmp hard drives. the price on sata drives is a lot less...you get what you pay for
sata vs. scsi drives
0
Comment
Question by:jeffsteffy
  • 3
  • 3
6 Comments
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:btassure
ID: 20420812
Buy more SATA drives and put them in RAID0+1 for the performance and for the redundancy. The main thing with SCSI disks is their reliability. Server drives get a LOT more usage than desktop units hence the price difference but if you can be quick with getting replacements online as one drive fails you should be able to get by.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:jeffsteffy
ID: 20421088
was going to set up in raid 5 with hot spare for fail
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:btassure
ID: 20421148
That would work too. :o)
0
NEW Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 1.5

With Office 365, it’s your data and your responsibility to protect it. NEW Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 eliminates the risk of losing access to your Office 365 data.

 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:jeffsteffy
ID: 20421375
would the sata drives be a lot slower then scsi drives as a file server?
0
 
LVL 16

Accepted Solution

by:
btassure earned 2000 total points
ID: 20421396
It depends on what type of scsi drives. They might be a tad slower overall but the biggest difference you will see will be down to the physical disk performance itself rather than the bus/interface speeds.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:jeffsteffy
ID: 20421874
Maybe the sata  drive server will do fine, from what i have read scsi are faster and more reiable, but sata server will cost al ot less
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Concerto Cloud Services, a provider of fully managed private, public and hybrid cloud solutions, announced today it was named to the 20 Coolest Cloud Infrastructure Vendors Of The 2017 Cloud  (http://www.concertocloud.com/about/in-the-news/2017/02/0…
Windows Server 2003 introduced persistent Volume Shadow Copies and made 2003 a must-do upgrade.  Since then, it's been a must-implement feature for all servers doing any kind of file sharing.
This video Micro Tutorial explains how to clone a hard drive using a commercial software product for Windows systems called Casper from Future Systems Solutions (FSS). Cloning makes an exact, complete copy of one hard disk drive (HDD) onto another d…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing the necessary services and then configuring a Windows Server 2012 system as an iSCSI target. To install the necessary roles, go to Server Manager, and select Add Roles and Featu…

829 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question