Formatting of new Array in 1+0

hello all,

just would like to get a general idea on my servers resources if I need to format 2 disks in a 1+0 array.  Iis very CPU intensive ?  This is my SQL server as well for our ERP

thx
heddieAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

MarkMichaelCommented:
A 1+0 array is a 4 disk array.
A RAID1 array is 2 disks
A RAID0 array can be 1 or 2 disks.
RAID1+0 would require 4 disks.
Are you running software or hardware RAID card?

Formatting doesn't generally take much CPU power either...
0
heddieAuthor Commented:
hi m,

1+0 on 2 disks.. the array is built... now just the formatting..u sure I need 4 disk??  as mentioned, the array is done.

its on a compaq 4330 array controller so hardware.

thc
0
MarkMichaelCommented:
Taken straight from Wikipedia :)

RAID 0+1: striped sets in a mirrored set (minimum 4 disks; even number of disks) provides fault tolerance and improved performance but increases complexity. The key difference from RAID 1+0 is that RAID 0+1 creates a second striped set to mirror a primary striped set. The array continues to operate with one or more drives failed in the same mirror set, but if two or more drives fail on different sides of the mirroring, the data on the RAID system is lost.
RAID 1+0: mirrored sets in a striped set (minimum 4 disks; even number of disks) provides fault tolerance and improved performance but increases complexity. The key difference from RAID 0+1 is that RAID 1+0 creates a striped set from a series of mirrored drives. In a failed disk situation RAID 1+0 performs better because all the remaining disks continue to be used. The array can sustain multiple drive losses as long as no two drives lost comprise a single pair of one mirror.

If it is 2 disks you have, then you are probably running RAID1, mirroring.
If you have set them up (somehow) as 1+0 with only 2 disks, the array should be in a critical state? Have you got some sort of Raid Manager to allow you to see the state of these drives?

Perhaps it's just being reported incorrectly.. Since you are running a hardware array, it should not take much (very little) CPU power.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
andyalderCommented:
>its on a compaq 4330 array controller so hardware.

No such animal, 4200 maybe. It's intensive on the RISC CPU imbedded on the RAID controller, the server CPU doesn't do anything except issue a command to kick the initiation off and monitor its progress from time to time.

Ignore the RAID 1+0 Vs RAID 1 issue, that's just terminology of the array configuration utility. Officially it is RAID 1 but as far as the GUI is concerned it is 1+0.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Server Hardware

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.