Vista Graphics 3.4 vs. 4.9 for NON-gaming?

I have a quad core pc with a  Vista Graphics performance score of 4.9 (nvidia 8500 GT).  Im about to purchase another quad core pc but I know its graphics score will be 3.4 (ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT).
I not a gamer, but want snappy thumbnails and good performance when I retouch photos in Photoshop Elements.

Question: Should I buy a better video card? Will I notice a difference?

Thanks for any thoughts,
Mike
mike2401Asked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Brian PiercePhotographerCommented:
My Dell has a 128Mb ATI card that scores 3.6 and is quite up to all I need including using photoshop CS3.
0
PUNKYCommented:
If it is just for photoshop, you wont see any differ.
0
Gary CaseRetiredCommented:
In a side-by-side comparison you'd notice quicker performance with a faster card ... especially in generation of thumbnails for a directory with a large number of photos.   But remember that's only done once ... and then Thumbs.db (a hidden, protected OS file) is maintained so the thumbnails are shown quickly in subsequent views.

I definitely notice a difference in generating the initial thumbnails on my system since I initially built it (with an older video card ... if I recall correctly the score was around 2.7) and my current card => an ATI Radeon 2600XT with a score of 5.5.    Photoshop also "feels" MUCH better than it did before ... but I didn't run any before/after benchmarks, so I don't know how much difference it might have made.

It all depends on just what you'll be using the system for.   With office apps, browsing, e-mail, etc. it won't make any difference => but with Photoshop & other Adobe programs (especially if you do any video rendering work) a faster card will definitely give you more "snap" :-)

0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Cloud Class® Course: Python 3 Fundamentals

This course will teach participants about installing and configuring Python, syntax, importing, statements, types, strings, booleans, files, lists, tuples, comprehensions, functions, and classes.

sparillaCommented:
Save your money and get photoshop cs3. Another video card may give you a false sense of how your picture is supposed to look like.
0
mike2401Author Commented:
This for the info.
My gateway quad core (Phenom) only came with a 300 watt power supply, and since I already threw in a second 500 gig drive, I decided to stick with the factory card.  For $750 bucks, I really cant complain  its a very nice pc with 4 sata ports (I added two esata brackets so Ive got plenty of room to grow!)
I never realized the thing about the thumbs.db  very true: subsequent views are plenty fast.
Interestingly: I have 300 gigs of photos, and the thumbs.db (located with my users\username path is 1.7 gigs!)
Regards,
Mike

0
Gary CaseRetiredCommented:
You're most welcome.   Definitely the right choice with only a 300w PSU.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Components

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.