Avatar of jiwonman
jiwonman asked on

I have a question regarding this setup *raid* mirroring? pics included!

I dont know how this happened since previous coworker made this...
this is a file server. this computer has two 300gb IDE harddrives, 26gb for c: and another 300 usb portable hard drive..

We are trying to upgrade this server near in the future.

I was planning to buy two 500gb SATA and SATA controller and make it as a raid-1

OR

purchase another two 300gbs and make them as a raid 5...

any suggestions? I am a beginner. So any help would be appreciated.

Also. Take a look at the pictures. why it does that.  I don't know what's happening on that computer..
 F: is not accesible.

Computer
1.6ghz intel Pentium 4.
512 Megabytes memory.

as.jpg
screen.jpg
StorageStorage Hardware

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
Gerald Connolly

8/22/2022 - Mon
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
AllKnowing1

Log in or sign up to see answer
Become an EE member today7-DAY FREE TRIAL
Members can start a 7-Day Free trial then enjoy unlimited access to the platform
Sign up - Free for 7 days
or
Learn why we charge membership fees
We get it - no one likes a content blocker. Take one extra minute and find out why we block content.
See how we're fighting big data
Not exactly the question you had in mind?
Sign up for an EE membership and get your own personalized solution. With an EE membership, you can ask unlimited troubleshooting, research, or opinion questions.
ask a question
ASKER
jiwonman

AllKnowing.
so for the cost wise and quality wise, 2 SATA hds with raid 1 is better than 4 IDE hds with raid5. correct? do you have any suggestion other than these two?

>>Drive E: is a  mirror.
what's the reason that it gives us the error on disk 2?
AllKnowing1

The cost and quality, yes. You have less chance for a failure and a quicker interface. If you wanted to spend money, go with SCSI. You will have to get another interface and more expensive HDD's.

Most likely there was an improper shutdown. Run a chkdisk on the drive.
Gerald Connolly

Don't go with parallel SCSI, it would be better to use Serial Attached SCSI (SAS).

SAS is fast and uses disks with 100% duty-cycle reliability (SATA is about 40%) and doesnt use those horrible inflexible parallel SCSI cables.

G
I started with Experts Exchange in 2004 and it's been a mainstay of my professional computing life since. It helped me launch a career as a programmer / Oracle data analyst
William Peck
ASKER
jiwonman

>>connollyg
Thank you but I am not spending lots of money for the scsi, since it will be used for file server.

>>allknowing1.
improper shutdown is most likely the reason that causes an error? I was going to do the chkdisk, but people were using it, i couldnt do it. :)
Gerald Connolly

My comments are surely worthy of an assist at least?