Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 866
  • Last Modified:

Problematic MDX query and getting descendents

I am trying to figure out an issue with my MDX query.  I am fairly certain it is an issue with the data in the data warehouse because it works on some DWs, but not all, and they all have the same structure.  I am fairly new to MDX, and I am at a loss as to how to troubleshoot this further.   The error is that the cells cannot be created for this cellset because one of the axes contains no positions.  I am using Analysis Services 2000.

Here is the query:

WITH MEMBER [Measures].[Ranking] As ' Rank ( [OBR], { [Top10] } ) ' SET [Top10] As ' { TopCount ( {Filter ( {Descendants ( [OBR].[Compensation],2 ) }, ( ([Measures].[RRPayoutBasisAmount],[Dates Broker].[All Dates Broker].[2008]) <> 0 ) )},10, ( [Measures].[RRPayoutBasisAmount], [Dates Broker].[All Dates Broker].[2008] ) ) } ' SELECT { CrossJoin ( { [Dates Broker].[All Dates Broker].[2008] }, {[Measures].[Ranking], [Measures].[RRPayoutBasisAmount]}) } ON COLUMNS, { [Top10] } ON ROWS FROM [Payout]

If I change the way that it gets the Descendents to {Descendants ( [OBR].[Compensation],1, AFTER ) } it works correctly.  Also, if I change the filter criteria to =0 rather than <> 0 returns data, but not ordered correctly.


0
kerryhill
Asked:
kerryhill
  • 3
  • 3
1 Solution
 
srnarCommented:
What do you mean "not ordered correctly". For sorting there is as you know a sort function with BDESC (break descendants) flag.
0
 
kerryhillAuthor Commented:
With the TopCount, it usuallys orders the records by ( [Measures].[RRPayoutBasisAmount], [Dates Broker].[All Dates Broker].[2008] ), but when I change the filter to = 0 rather than <> 0 it returns records, but they are not ordered by ( [Measures].[RRPayoutBasisAmount], [Dates Broker].[All Dates Broker].[2008] ).  They seem to have their default order.  The records that are returned when I change the filter to  ([Measures].[RRPayoutBasisAmount],[Dates Broker].[All Dates Broker].[2008]) = 0 ) are not all 0 values either, it is very odd.  

I have about 30 databases that use this MDX query, and it does not work on around 10 of them, but it is fine on the others.  I have one database where there is a test copy of the data, which is an older copy of the same database where this does not work, and it works correctly.  If I take the OLAP database and point it to that test copy of the database and process it, it works correctly.  

At some point the data seems to have gotten out of whack, but I am confused as to how to figure out how.  It seems strange that it works correctly if I get the list of Descendents by doing a 1, AFTER, but if I go directly to the 2nd Level, it does not work (Descendents,2)?

Thank you for any help you can offer.
0
 
srnarCommented:
kerryhill, that seems weird (20 from 30 works fine) - it may come from data. Do you have MemberNamesUnique set to True on queried dimensions?

If not - is it possible to set it (on 2005 version it does not need reprocess but not sure on 2000) and retry MDX?
0
Concerto Cloud for Software Providers & ISVs

Can Concerto Cloud Services help you focus on evolving your application offerings, while delivering the best cloud experience to your customers? From DevOps to revenue models and customer support, the answer is yes!

Learn how Concerto can help you.

 
kerryhillAuthor Commented:
I can't because the member names are not unique.  I checked the test copy of the database, and it is set to false as well, but the MDX is successful on that db.  I agree that it is data related.  I just can't find the bad data....

I guess I am confused as to what is the difference between going directly to Level 2 of the dimension, and using "1, AFTER "?  
0
 
srnarCommented:
kerryhill, there is a difference between the two: "1, AFTER ", Level 2. Default flag in Descendant function is SELF - so it takes only members of the 2nd level (no 3 level, no LEAVES...). Equivalent to "1, AFTER " is "2, SELF_AND_AFTER". See following snippet from Adventure Works.
--176 rows (incl header) - members including leaves with Amount not empty
select [Measures].[Sales Amount] on columns,
nonempty(
	descendants(
		[Product].[Product Categories].[All Products], 1, AFTER
	)
) on rows
from [Adventure Works];
 
--ame as above
select [Measures].[Sales Amount] on columns,
nonempty(
	descendants(
		[Product].[Product Categories].[All Products], 2, SELF_AND_AFTER
	)
) on rows
from [Adventure Works];
 
--38 rows (incl header) - 37 members of the Subcategory level
select [Measures].[Sales Amount] on columns,
(
	descendants(
		[Product].[Product Categories].[All Products], 2
	)
) on rows
from [Adventure Works];
 
--same as above - SELF is default
select [Measures].[Sales Amount] on columns,
(
	descendants(
		[Product].[Product Categories].[All Products], 2, SELF
	)
) on rows
from [Adventure Works];
 
--180 rows (incl header) = like 1 AFTER + {[All Products], [Accessories], [Bikes], [Clothing]}
--note Compoents member has [Sales Amount] empty
select [Measures].[Sales Amount] on columns,
nonempty(
	descendants(
		[Product].[Product Categories].[All Products], 2, SELF_BEFORE_AFTER
	)
) on rows
from [Adventure Works];

Open in new window

0
 
kerryhillAuthor Commented:
It did confirm that I was not crazy.  I used the work around, I am still not sure why it doesn't work going directly to the child branch.
0

Featured Post

Concerto Cloud for Software Providers & ISVs

Can Concerto Cloud Services help you focus on evolving your application offerings, while delivering the best cloud experience to your customers? From DevOps to revenue models and customer support, the answer is yes!

Learn how Concerto can help you.

  • 3
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now