Solved

Need to replace an SR224 24-port switch with its 48 port equivalent

Posted on 2008-06-11
4
313 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-21
Hi All,

I'm doing a little bit of network upgrading work in my kid's school and currently they have a Linksys SR224G 24-port switch and it's maxed out. I need to replace it with a 48-port equivalent.

I'm thinking of the Linksys SLM248P-G5. Would this be suitable? I'm assuming I'll literally just pull the other one out, pop this one in and recable. Am I correct?

Thanks,
Jeff
0
Comment
Question by:jeffeld
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:chrismanncalgavin
ID: 21758485
Looks ok to me but you might want to bear in mind that the SLM248P-G5 is a managed switch which has extra functions and also 2 special ports designed for uplinks (connections to other switches).
I believe you can probably use these as normal ports though, which would mean you could literally replace it like for like with the other one.
It would however be cheaper to use a non-managed switch unless you plan on monitoring and controlling who has access to certain resources / traffic etc.

We use Dlink switches which are cheaper and do the job, but depends on the money available as Linksys are probably better.
You could pick one up for around £200 for a low end model.

0
 

Author Comment

by:jeffeld
ID: 21758501
Ah... wondered why it was that much more expensive :-)

Would a SLM248G-G5 be a more suitable replacement? Here's the link to it on the suppliers website (have to use them as the school has a ¬2000 prize to spend!)

http://www.cxcommerce.com/pgProduct.htm~cx~7E77839DD37678338BD84FD5B7FFE14730A3944E571AC00D0C1A8E0E8E85F89CF4D699DFDB81E953DDF96F0DEE8B89CDF8132FE25148

Cheers!
0
 
LVL 8

Accepted Solution

by:
chrismanncalgavin earned 500 total points
ID: 21758551
Looks like a good alternative yes.
Still managed, but all the 48 port ones seem to be managed just the more expensive ones have more features which would probably be irrelevant to you!

They do a Netgear one which looks good also:
http://www.cxcommerce.com/pgProduct.cfm?cx=7E77839DD37678338BD84FD5B7FFE14730A3944E5E1FCD0B1D7DBF0EA8B2EBD3FAD79DDEB3ECEE52DCFD680C88ED89CBF8152DEB5E

The one you chose has 2 extra "uplink" ports so you do have 48 normal ports as well which is good.
If you wanted you could link the old switch together via this port and have 72 total ports! (might be a bit over the top for now but useful in the future).

Hope you get it sorted.

Chris
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:jeffeld
ID: 31466078
Brilliant. Thanks very much!
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Path Explorer

An intuitive utility to help find the CSS path to UI elements on a webpage. These paths are used frequently in a variety of front-end development and QA automation tasks.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
F5 SSL Sticky Load Balancing Question 3 62
HP Procurve and AAA authentication 2 42
Switch ports not working 8 70
Layer 3 switch recommendation 15 48
I eventually solved a perplexing problem setting up telnet for a new switch.  I installed a new Cisco WS-03560X-24P switch connected to an existing Cisco 4506 running a WS-X4013-10GE Sup II-Plus. After configuring vlans and trunking,  I could no…
Attackers love to prey on accounts that have privileges. Reducing privileged accounts and protecting privileged accounts therefore is paramount. Users, groups, and service accounts need to be protected to help protect the entire Active Directory …

685 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question