?
Solved

Configuring Terminal Server for Remote User Access

Posted on 2008-06-11
3
Medium Priority
?
288 Views
Last Modified: 2011-10-19
Hi:

I am configuring a 2003 Terminal Server for Clients to connect throught the Internet, I need this to be as secure as possible. I have looked at using 2X Application Server with the Web Portal hopefully over SSL if I can get it to work, any suggestions would be appreciated as to how to configure this securely.

My main questions is user Accounts, This is a single server that 5 different organizations will be connecting to with seperate data that each organization needs to keep private from the others. Should I create it as a Domain Controller or just as a stand alone server and use the built in user accounts?

With the DC enviroment I can use Group Policy to restrict access to the server but I don't know that I can do that with the loal user Accounts. Remove the C: drive, Launch only certain applications that type of thing, any suggestions or direction would be appreciated.

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:hpeet
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
raptorjb007 earned 1500 total points
ID: 21760579
I would highly recommend against making your terminal server a DC.

Preferably the terminal server would be a standalone member-server in its own OU to allow for application of a Terminal server specific Group policy.

Microsoft has some decent documents on this subject, I would suggest you review the document I attached. It goes over most of the basic group policy settings and configuration you may want to apply to lock down a terminal server.
Win2003-Teminal-Server-Lockdown.doc
0
 

Author Comment

by:hpeet
ID: 21760674
Thanks for the Post.

The Problem is this server is truly a Stand alone server there is no existing Domain for it to be a member of, so my options would be to make this server a DC or to use the Local User Accounts.
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:raptorjb007
ID: 21760743
In that case, you can leave it a stand alone server.

It would be more secure as a stand alone server using local accounts as it will run far less services which reduces it attack surface. You could still lock it down in that configuration. However if you need to apply different group policies to different sets of users, the  only solution would be to create a domain at setup user OU's and policies.
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

So you have two Windows Servers and you have a directory/folder/files on one that you'd like to mirror to the other?  You don't really want to deal with DFS or a 3rd party solution like Doubletake. You can use Robocopy from the Windows Server 200…
A quick step-by-step overview of installing and configuring Carbonite Server Backup.
Michael from AdRem Software outlines event notifications and Automatic Corrective Actions in network monitoring. Automatic Corrective Actions are scripts, which can automatically run upon discovery of a certain undesirable condition in your network.…
In this video, Percona Solution Engineer Dimitri Vanoverbeke discusses why you want to use at least three nodes in a database cluster. To discuss how Percona Consulting can help with your design and architecture needs for your database and infras…
Suggested Courses

770 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question