Solved

MDADM Raid 5 Issues

Posted on 2008-06-13
5
788 Views
Last Modified: 2016-12-08
I am running FC8 and have a DS1220 12-disk storage pack.  The second 5 disks are assembled into a software raid level 5 array.  The array has automatically gone off line twice in the last two weeks causing me to re-create or re-assemble.  I have backed up my data so I feel reasonably safe about that; however, I am attempting to diagnose the cause of the problem and have seen that one of the devices comprising the array is "removed".

mdadm --detail /dev/md4
/dev/md4:
        Version : 00.90.03
  Creation Time : Sat Jun  7 15:09:36 2008
     Raid Level : raid5
     Array Size : 1953535744 (1863.04 GiB 2000.42 GB)
  Used Dev Size : 488383936 (465.76 GiB 500.11 GB)
   Raid Devices : 5
  Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 4
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

    Update Time : Fri Jun 13 20:42:57 2008
          State : clean, degraded
 Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0

         Layout : left-symmetric
     Chunk Size : 64K

           UUID : 494bce9a:c596eeb1:1b66a7c1:828cf00a
         Events : 0.334

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       8      177        0      active sync   /dev/sdl1
       1       8      193        1      active sync   /dev/sdm1
       2       8      209        2      active sync   /dev/sdn1
       3       8      225        3      active sync   /dev/sdo1
       4       0        0        4      removed

The device that is removed is /dev/sdp1.  If I attempt to re-add, the device gets added as a "faulty spare".

mdadm --detail /dev/md4
/dev/md4:
        Version : 00.90.03
  Creation Time : Sat Jun  7 15:09:36 2008
     Raid Level : raid5
     Array Size : 1953535744 (1863.04 GiB 2000.42 GB)
  Used Dev Size : 488383936 (465.76 GiB 500.11 GB)
   Raid Devices : 5
  Total Devices : 5
Preferred Minor : 4
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

    Update Time : Fri Jun 13 21:04:56 2008
          State : clean, degraded, recovering
 Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 5
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 1

         Layout : left-symmetric
     Chunk Size : 64K

 Rebuild Status : 0% complete

           UUID : 494bce9a:c596eeb1:1b66a7c1:828cf00a
         Events : 0.340

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       8      177        0      active sync   /dev/sdl1
       1       8      193        1      active sync   /dev/sdm1
       2       8      209        2      active sync   /dev/sdn1
       3       8      225        3      active sync   /dev/sdo1
       4       0        0        4      removed

       5       8      241        -      faulty spare   /dev/sdp1

I have read that this may be due to the devices being assembled out of order, but also I am not sure if I truely have a failed drive.  How does one know for sure?  How can I get my raid back to a non-degraded state?

Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:daveokst
  • 3
  • 2
5 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:daveokst
ID: 21784058
Also, I recall from the first time I got the raid back together, I was moving a 250g TC container to a backup drive, but the cp process failed both times at the exact same spot.  The raid was degraded as usual during these attempts.
0
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:ravenpl
ID: 21784458
What "cat /proc/mdstat" says?
What command have You used to add this offed device?
0
 

Author Comment

by:daveokst
ID: 21785473
I used --re-ad once and I tried --add another time, like this...
mdadm --add /dev/md4 /dev/sdp1
mdadm: re-added /dev/sdp1

mdadm --detail /dev/md4 revealed the same wither way.

cat /proc/mdstat shows...

md4 : active raid5 sdl1[0] sdp1[5](F) sdo1[3] sdn1[2] sdm1[1]
      1953535744 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/4] [UUUU_]


I assume the (F) means 'faulty', but that doesn't necessaruly mean the drive is failed does it?

Thanks!
0
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:ravenpl
ID: 21785518
F means faulty. Before adding it back, You have to remove it first
mdadm /dev/md4 -r /dev/sdp1
mdadm /dev/md4 -a /dev/sdp1
#should do the trick.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
daveokst earned 0 total points
ID: 21785917
thx... I tried this, did not work.  I just decided to reformat the drives.  Thx for your assistance.
0

Featured Post

Microsoft Certification Exam 74-409

Veeam® is happy to provide the Microsoft community with a study guide prepared by MVP and MCT, Orin Thomas. This guide will take you through each of the exam objectives, helping you to prepare for and pass the examination.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction We as admins face situation where we need to redirect websites to another. This may be required as a part of an upgrade keeping the old URL but website should be served from new URL. This document would brief you on different ways ca…
Fine Tune your automatic Updates for Ubuntu / Debian
Learn how to navigate the file tree with the shell. Use pwd to print the current working directory: Use ls to list a directory's contents: Use cd to change to a new directory: Use wildcards instead of typing out long directory names: Use ../ to move…
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.

785 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question